Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

silopoint.com

SILO POINT / Luxury Condominiums Baltimore Waterfront

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

164 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

516 ms

silopoint.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SILO POINT content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about silopoint.com

Silo Point in Baltimore boasts contemporary, stunning, industrial, luxury waterfront condos in the Locust Point neighborhood of Baltimore. Live in the Sky.

Visit silopoint.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Silopoint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

silopoint.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.519

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

silopoint.com

164 ms

css

52 ms

style.css

104 ms

colorbox.css

105 ms

flexslider.css

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 203 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (187 requests) were addressed to the original Silopoint.com, 2% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (592 ms) belongs to the original domain Silopoint.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 345.9 kB (3%)

Content Size

13.1 MB

After Optimization

12.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Silopoint.com main page is 13.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 12.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 119.9 kB

  • Original 136.7 kB
  • After minification 101.8 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.9 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 198.9 kB

  • Original 12.7 MB
  • After minification 12.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SILO POINT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 18.5 kB

  • Original 230.2 kB
  • After minification 230.2 kB
  • After compression 211.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Silopoint.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.5 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (16%)

Requests Now

195

After Optimization

163

The browser has sent 195 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SILO POINT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

silopoint.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

silopoint.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

silopoint.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Silopoint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Silopoint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SILO POINT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: