Tools & Wizards About Us
silstonegroup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

silstonegroup.com

Best Medical / Healthcare Software Development Company | Silstone Health

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

336 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

395 ms

silstonegroup.com screenshot

About Website

Visit silstonegroup.com now to see the best up-to-date Silstone Group content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about silstonegroup.com

Silstone Health: Your destination for cutting-edge custom software solutions in healthcare. Transform your healthcare practice now.

Visit silstonegroup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Silstonegroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 336 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

silstonegroup.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

silstonegroup.com

336 ms

www.silstonegroup.com

331 ms

script.js

44 ms

layerslider.css

97 ms

style.min.css

133 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Silstonegroup.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (817 ms) belongs to the original domain Silstonegroup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 598.8 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

941.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Silstonegroup.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 229.8 kB

  • Original 274.2 kB
  • After minification 273.1 kB
  • After compression 44.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 229.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 368.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 862.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Silstone Group needs image optimization as it can save up to 368.9 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 34.3 kB
  • After minification 34.3 kB
  • After compression 34.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (81%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Silstone Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

silstonegroup.com

silstonegroup.com

336 ms

www.silstonegroup.com

www.silstonegroup.com

331 ms

script.js

script.js

44 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

97 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

133 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

123 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

136 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

113 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

104 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

194 ms

styles.css

styles.css

217 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

223 ms

rss-retriever.css

rss-retriever.css

179 ms

slick.css

slick.css

227 ms

wpsisac-public.css

wpsisac-public.css

278 ms

be.css

be.css

361 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

306 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

335 ms

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

320 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

340 ms

css

css

75 ms

style.css

style.css

408 ms

css

css

76 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

416 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

413 ms

mailin-front.css

mailin-front.css

440 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

458 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

470 ms

layerslider.utils.js

layerslider.utils.js

548 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

573 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

522 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.min.js

jquery.easy-ticker.min.js

503 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

584 ms

js

js

85 ms

mailin-front.js

mailin-front.js

507 ms

post-47.css

post-47.css

570 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

734 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

735 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

737 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

737 ms

6327975.js

6327975.js

79 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

734 ms

log

log

417 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

647 ms

index.js

index.js

643 ms

index.js

index.js

646 ms

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

682 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

721 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

817 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

674 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

759 ms

debouncedresize.min.js

debouncedresize.min.js

655 ms

magnificpopup.min.js

magnificpopup.min.js

741 ms

menu.js

menu.js

734 ms

visible.min.js

visible.min.js

730 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

682 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

763 ms

enllax.min.js

enllax.min.js

735 ms

translate3d.js

translate3d.js

704 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

695 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

667 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

644 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

669 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

716 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

657 ms

blog_masonry_tile_gradient.png

blog_masonry_tile_gradient.png

527 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

104 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

204 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

229 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

231 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

229 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

232 ms

icons.woff

icons.woff

567 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtFOvWDSA.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtFOvWDSA.ttf

230 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eLYktMqg.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eLYktMqg.ttf

231 ms

BPM.png

BPM.png

261 ms

MindManager-Blog-Remote-Teams-scaled.jpg

MindManager-Blog-Remote-Teams-scaled.jpg

311 ms

strategy.png

strategy.png

103 ms

home_agency3_bg.png

home_agency3_bg.png

215 ms

code.png

code.png

159 ms

machine-learning.png

machine-learning.png

163 ms

team.png

team.png

209 ms

Union-2.png

Union-2.png

180 ms

doctor.png

doctor.png

206 ms

Silstone-Health-Logo-1.png

Silstone-Health-Logo-1.png

206 ms

Web-1920-%E2%80%93-11-1.png

Web-1920-%E2%80%93-11-1.png

232 ms

Accessibility Review

silstonegroup.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

silstonegroup.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

silstonegroup.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Silstonegroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Silstonegroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

silstonegroup.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Silstone Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: