Tools & Wizards About Us
silversign.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

silversign.in

silversign.in – With You…! For All Your Needs

Page Load Speed

13.1 sec in total

First Response

610 ms

Resources Loaded

9.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.8 sec

silversign.in screenshot

About Website

Visit silversign.in now to see the best up-to-date Silversign content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about silversign.in

Visit silversign.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Silversign.in page load time and found that the first response time was 610 ms and then it took 12.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

silversign.in performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

silversign.in

610 ms

silversign.in

1702 ms

main.min.css

566 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

841 ms

wc-all-blocks-style.css

850 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Silversign.in, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Silversign.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 248.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Silversign.in main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 231.2 kB

  • Original 276.3 kB
  • After minification 273.5 kB
  • After compression 45.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 231.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 15.4 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Silversign images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 765 B

  • Original 199.7 kB
  • After minification 199.7 kB
  • After compression 199.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 140.6 kB
  • After minification 140.6 kB
  • After compression 139.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Silversign.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (80%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Silversign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

silversign.in

silversign.in

610 ms

silversign.in

silversign.in

1702 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

566 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

841 ms

wc-all-blocks-style.css

wc-all-blocks-style.css

850 ms

woocommerce-layout-grid.min.css

woocommerce-layout-grid.min.css

862 ms

woocommerce-grid.min.css

woocommerce-grid.min.css

1164 ms

xoo-el-style.css

xoo-el-style.css

870 ms

xoo-el-fonts.css

xoo-el-fonts.css

891 ms

xoo-aff-style.css

xoo-aff-style.css

1118 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1135 ms

select2.css

select2.css

1188 ms

style.basic.css

style.basic.css

1160 ms

style-curvy-blue.css

style-curvy-blue.css

1196 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

1398 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1419 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1452 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

1454 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1475 ms

global.css

global.css

1494 ms

post-18.css

post-18.css

1678 ms

post-250.css

post-250.css

1700 ms

css

css

32 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1744 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1743 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2051 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1789 ms

css

css

47 ms

widget-woocommerce.min.css

widget-woocommerce.min.css

2239 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

1981 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

2032 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

2031 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

2094 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

2332 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

2332 ms

select2.full.min.js

select2.full.min.js

2333 ms

xoo-aff-js.js

xoo-aff-js.js

2076 ms

smooth-scrollbar.js

smooth-scrollbar.js

2412 ms

xoo-el-js.js

xoo-el-js.js

2249 ms

asl-prereq.js

asl-prereq.js

2273 ms

asl-core.js

asl-core.js

2060 ms

asl-results-vertical.js

asl-results-vertical.js

1788 ms

asl-autocomplete.js

asl-autocomplete.js

1771 ms

asl-load.js

asl-load.js

1943 ms

asl-wrapper.js

asl-wrapper.js

1960 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

2023 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

1800 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

1778 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1823 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1918 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

1924 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

2007 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1806 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1789 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1828 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1911 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1918 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1999 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1812 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

1802 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1834 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1892 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1885 ms

Logo-1024x524.png

Logo-1024x524.png

2267 ms

GaneshChaturthi_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

GaneshChaturthi_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

2568 ms

05i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

05i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

2581 ms

01i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

01i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

2972 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

19 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

23 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

30 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

31 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

32 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

33 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

31 ms

02i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

02i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

2664 ms

03i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

03i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

2463 ms

04i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

04i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

2588 ms

06i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

06i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

2608 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

2612 ms

star.woff

star.woff

2695 ms

Easy-Login.ttf

Easy-Login.ttf

2560 ms

00i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

00i_HB_Web-scaled.jpg

2667 ms

Platinum_Srushty_03.jpg

Platinum_Srushty_03.jpg

2616 ms

153166826-116607439-1663670676-300x300.jpg

153166826-116607439-1663670676-300x300.jpg

2625 ms

popup-sidebar.jpg

popup-sidebar.jpg

2696 ms

silversign.in

silversign.in

3658 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen-grid.min.css

woocommerce-smallscreen-grid.min.css

284 ms

Accessibility Review

silversign.in accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

silversign.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

silversign.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Silversign.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Silversign.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

silversign.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Silversign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: