8.8 sec in total
2.9 sec
5.5 sec
336 ms
Welcome to simbip.ru homepage info - get ready to check Simbip best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about simbip.ru
Visit simbip.ruWe analyzed Simbip.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
simbip.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value1,580 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.131
81/100
15%
Value21.7 s
1/100
10%
2939 ms
291 ms
286 ms
295 ms
287 ms
Our browser made a total of 146 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (96 requests) were addressed to the original Simbip.ru, 11% (16 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 5% (7 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Simbip.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 890.3 kB (47%)
1.9 MB
987.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Simbip.ru main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 991.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Simbip images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 626.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 626.4 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 141.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Simbip.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 141.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 96 (69%)
140
44
The browser has sent 140 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Simbip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
simbip.ru
2939 ms
system.base.css
291 ms
system.menus.css
286 ms
system.messages.css
295 ms
system.theme.css
287 ms
aggregator.css
292 ms
book.css
406 ms
comment.css
429 ms
date.css
429 ms
datepicker.1.7.css
433 ms
field.css
430 ms
node.css
434 ms
poll.css
541 ms
search.css
559 ms
user.css
559 ms
forum.css
564 ms
views.css
564 ms
back_to_top.css
572 ms
ckeditor.css
677 ms
ctools.css
691 ms
follow.css
691 ms
typogrify.css
699 ms
views_jqfx_cycle.css
699 ms
gmap.css
712 ms
views_mosaic.css
813 ms
superfish.css
822 ms
boilerplate.css
825 ms
style.css
839 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
975 ms
jquery.once.js
852 ms
drupal.js
951 ms
jquery.effects.core.min.js
956 ms
mosaic.1.0.1.min.js
958 ms
back_to_top.js
1000 ms
ru_tu9MnbKrUn4S5PtFSidY0PGtA7QjDXTi7Bat92lUaFY.js
1001 ms
floating_block.js
1088 ms
js
40 ms
font-awesome.min.css
38 ms
element.js
70 ms
galleria.folio.css
834 ms
last-min.css
820 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
839 ms
views_jqfx_cycle.js
838 ms
views_mosaic.js
857 ms
gmap.js
945 ms
icon.js
830 ms
marker.js
807 ms
highlight.js
831 ms
poly.js
831 ms
gmap_markers.js
856 ms
markerloader_static.js
933 ms
gmap_marker.js
828 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
815 ms
superfish.js
838 ms
supersubs.js
836 ms
superfish.js
865 ms
theme608.core.js
927 ms
jquery.loader.js
824 ms
jquery.polls.loader.js
819 ms
cssua.min.js
841 ms
counter.js
860 ms
bg.gif
482 ms
og-logo.png
139 ms
bg-row.gif
287 ms
logo.png
286 ms
search.gif
284 ms
blank.png
287 ms
nf0a1384.jpg
480 ms
nf0a4478.jpg
602 ms
nf0a4799.jpg
484 ms
nf0a5247.jpg
610 ms
iic_slider.jpg
564 ms
apparatnyy-manikyur.jpg
663 ms
468320_1.jpg
629 ms
nf0a7362.jpg
647 ms
land.jpg
649 ms
license.jpg
718 ms
svid.jpg
747 ms
1.jpg
780 ms
1.jpg
786 ms
2.jpg
792 ms
1_0.jpg
799 ms
blank.gif
857 ms
translateelement.css
55 ms
main.js
118 ms
widget.js
283 ms
16a.png
800 ms
icon-vk.png
811 ms
bg-row2.gif
835 ms
bg-li.gif
858 ms
bg-menu-active.png
859 ms
bg-slide-title.png
898 ms
bg-li-categories.gif
936 ms
progress.gif
944 ms
bg-block-h.gif
972 ms
bg-block.gif
989 ms
bg-node.gif
991 ms
more.gif
1031 ms
bg-footer.gif
1073 ms
watch.js
233 ms
SimbipFont.woff
1042 ms
analytics.js
157 ms
element_main.js
156 ms
backtotop.png
918 ms
common.js
67 ms
map.js
64 ms
overlay.js
63 ms
collect
51 ms
translate_24dp.png
131 ms
l
79 ms
watch.js
480 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
121 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
112 ms
util.js
89 ms
marker.js
62 ms
infowindow.js
106 ms
onion.js
72 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
79 ms
comment-recent.js
327 ms
comment-recent.css
328 ms
comment-count.js
350 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
56 ms
stats.js
35 ms
controls.js
47 ms
transparent.png
43 ms
css
58 ms
google4.png
34 ms
vt
48 ms
vt
25 ms
orange.png
624 ms
mapcnt6.png
25 ms
sv5.png
32 ms
vt
43 ms
tmapctrl.png
31 ms
imgs8.png
32 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
265 ms
recent
96 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
24 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
51 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
50 ms
advert.gif
94 ms
RUnUQ71zli8.jpg
363 ms
WGVAYMWNZxI.jpg
424 ms
bGbETgg33rk.jpg
372 ms
1
92 ms
simbip.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
simbip.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
simbip.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Simbip.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Simbip.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
simbip.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Simbip. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: