Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

92 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

505 ms

similarimagefinder.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Similarimagefinder content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about similarimagefinder.com

Find duplicate photos or images on your PC even if they are not exactly the same. This is a freeware.

Visit similarimagefinder.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Similarimagefinder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

similarimagefinder.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

similarimagefinder.com

92 ms

www.similarimagefinder.com

150 ms

3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css

146 ms

authorization.css

197 ms

plusone.js

174 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Similarimagefinder.com, 25% (13 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to Blogger.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (680 ms) relates to the external source Static.flattr.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 114.0 kB (29%)

Content Size

389.3 kB

After Optimization

275.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Similarimagefinder.com main page is 389.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 176.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 53.1 kB

  • Original 68.8 kB
  • After minification 68.6 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 176.5 kB
  • After minification 174.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Similarimagefinder images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 16.1 kB

  • Original 78.1 kB
  • After minification 74.0 kB
  • After compression 62.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.1 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 43.0 kB

  • Original 65.9 kB
  • After minification 65.7 kB
  • After compression 22.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Similarimagefinder.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.0 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (59%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Similarimagefinder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

similarimagefinder.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Similarimagefinder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Similarimagefinder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Similarimagefinder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: