7.5 sec in total
2.7 sec
4.5 sec
194 ms
Click here to check amazing Simplifilm content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about simplifilm.com
Product Demo Videos To Help You Explain Your Advantages In two minutes - or less - you can explain what it is that makes your team work perfectly. We've helped …
Visit simplifilm.comWe analyzed Simplifilm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
simplifilm.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value4,840 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.126
83/100
15%
Value18.0 s
3/100
10%
2733 ms
30 ms
60 ms
66 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Simplifilm.com, 14% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Simplifilm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 781.7 kB (72%)
1.1 MB
310.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Simplifilm.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 587.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 96.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Simplifilm needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 401.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 401.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 272.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Simplifilm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 272.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (82%)
71
13
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Simplifilm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
simplifilm.com
2733 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
30 ms
prettyPhoto.css
60 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
66 ms
front.css
62 ms
sow-headline-sow-headline-7d69c052fcdb.css
63 ms
jquery.background-video.css
63 ms
so_video_background.css
56 ms
bootstrap.min.css
109 ms
font-awesome.min.css
85 ms
bigvideo.css
88 ms
style.css
95 ms
shortcodes.css
93 ms
cl-review.css
97 ms
jetpack.css
122 ms
jquery.js
152 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
120 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
130 ms
video-lightbox.js
115 ms
en-spam.js
131 ms
equal-height-columns-public.js
149 ms
jquery.fittext.js
174 ms
styling-23.min.js
171 ms
external-tracking.min.js
168 ms
css
25 ms
css
38 ms
youtube.js
9 ms
pinit.js
12 ms
owl.carousel.css
167 ms
widgets.css
190 ms
jquery.background-video.js
189 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
8 ms
gprofiles.js
57 ms
wpgroho.js
270 ms
bootstrap.min.js
300 ms
bootstrap-select.min.js
303 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
306 ms
jquery.superslides.js
328 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
328 ms
modernizr-2.5.3.min.js
331 ms
video.js
326 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
330 ms
e-201611.js
6 ms
bigvideo.js
328 ms
main.js
1444 ms
menu.js
1413 ms
shortcodes.js
1410 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1411 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1409 ms
count.js
1408 ms
all.js
1282 ms
analytics.js
99 ms
js
92 ms
iframe_api
148 ms
platform.js
1274 ms
simplifilm.png
1279 ms
play-simplifilm.png
1279 ms
baer400-150x150.png
1280 ms
victora-150x150.jpg
1279 ms
pinit_main.js
1181 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
1152 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEMbjGELOEJD5J8DUmxkO-A.ttf
1169 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
1173 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf
1176 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
1176 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBPPOa1q11iOmmM9mDHHHX4.ttf
1176 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Iue0YgdIF4L_q7PS4yTQOQ.ttf
1172 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6BzYcsdbdSWRnnT3pSZS3xU.ttf
1175 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM0DauxaEVho0aInXGvhmB4k.ttf
1176 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6EfrksRSinjQUrHtm_nW72g.ttf
1175 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Edtd7Dq2ZflsctMEexj2lw.ttf
1176 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6DiS5Fc5Bg1xsygf01vWWOU.ttf
1176 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1188 ms
collect
1151 ms
www-widgetapi.js
37 ms
in.php
257 ms
__utm.gif
48 ms
151 ms
xd_arbiter.php
143 ms
xd_arbiter.php
215 ms
count.js
132 ms
g.gif
127 ms
hovercard.css
95 ms
services.css
123 ms
simplifilm.com
81 ms
simplifilm.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
simplifilm.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
simplifilm.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Simplifilm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Simplifilm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
simplifilm.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Simplifilm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: