4.3 sec in total
342 ms
3.4 sec
529 ms
Click here to check amazing Sin content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sin.de
Visit sin.deWe analyzed Sin.de page load time and found that the first response time was 342 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
sin.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value13.0 s
2/100
10%
Value1,150 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
342 ms
1146 ms
319 ms
324 ms
326 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Sin.de, 21% (16 requests) were made to Schnell-im-netz.de and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Schnell-im-netz.de.
Page size can be reduced by 291.9 kB (20%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Sin.de main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 670.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 237.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 237.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sin images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sin.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (66%)
61
21
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sin.de
342 ms
sin.de
1146 ms
style.min.css
319 ms
cbxuseronline-public.css
324 ms
styles.css
326 ms
cool-tag-cloud.css
332 ms
wplc-plugin-public.css
334 ms
polls-css.css
343 ms
be.css
538 ms
animations.min.css
425 ms
fontawesome.css
534 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.min.css
450 ms
responsive.css
451 ms
borlabs-cookie_1_de.css
458 ms
style.css
421 ms
jquery.min.js
553 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
457 ms
js
49 ms
omgf-stylesheet-95.css
723 ms
rs6.css
423 ms
index.js
429 ms
index.js
434 ms
rbtools.min.js
615 ms
rs6.min.js
813 ms
polls-js.js
559 ms
core.min.js
560 ms
tabs.min.js
559 ms
debouncedresize.min.js
559 ms
magnificpopup.min.js
715 ms
menu.js
715 ms
visible.min.js
715 ms
animations.min.js
714 ms
jplayer.min.js
714 ms
enllax.min.js
810 ms
translate3d.js
809 ms
scripts.js
821 ms
api.js
59 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
810 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
809 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
914 ms
index.js
808 ms
slick.min.js
814 ms
borlabs-cookie.min.js
807 ms
gtm.js
95 ms
icon_mail-1.png
446 ms
dummy.png
467 ms
check_orange_small.png
542 ms
cloudsystemsliderbild.jpg
746 ms
telefonsliderbild.jpg
660 ms
internet-und-festnetz-blau3.png
500 ms
internet-und-festnetz-orange4.png
602 ms
business-telefonalagen-blau3.png
550 ms
business-telefonalagen-orange3.png
661 ms
cloud-systeme-blau3.png
710 ms
cloud-systeme-orange3.png
768 ms
system-betreuung-blau3.png
791 ms
system-betreuung-orange3.png
872 ms
AdobeStock_138548194-scaled.jpeg
1314 ms
pcvisit.png
969 ms
DINWeb-Light.woff
943 ms
roboto-v18-latin-300.woff
418 ms
roboto-v18-latin-100.woff
445 ms
roboto-v18-latin-regular.woff
445 ms
roboto-v18-latin-500.woff
511 ms
roboto-v18-latin-700.woff
528 ms
roboto-v18-latin-900.woff
529 ms
icons.woff
529 ms
roboto-v18-latin-300italic.woff
612 ms
roboto-v18-latin-100italic.woff
635 ms
roboto-v18-latin-italic.woff
635 ms
roboto-v18-latin-500italic.woff
635 ms
roboto-v18-latin-700italic.woff
635 ms
roboto-v18-latin-900italic.woff
715 ms
play-right.png
1051 ms
trenner_full_width-orange.jpg
1156 ms
icon_footer_list_small.png
1263 ms
pfeil_nach_oben.jpg
1286 ms
sin.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sin.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sin.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sin.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sin.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sin.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: