Tools & Wizards About Us
singergrp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

singergrp.com

Human Resources Consulting Firm | Baltimore County, Maryland, MD

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

143 ms

Resources Loaded

672 ms

Page Rendered

307 ms

singergrp.com screenshot

About Website

Visit singergrp.com now to see the best up-to-date Singergrp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about singergrp.com

Baltimore-based full service human resource consulting firm. The Singer Group, Inc., Reistertown, Baltimore County, Maryland, MD

Visit singergrp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Singergrp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 979 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

singergrp.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.singergrp.com

143 ms

style.css

14 ms

style.css

50 ms

dashicons.min.css

61 ms

desktop_style.css

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Singergrp.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (227 ms) belongs to the original domain Singergrp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 46.6 kB (20%)

Content Size

229.3 kB

After Optimization

182.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Singergrp.com main page is 229.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 137.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 20.8 kB

  • Original 28.7 kB
  • After minification 27.3 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 137.3 kB
  • After minification 115.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Singergrp needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 61.7 kB
  • After minification 61.7 kB
  • After compression 58.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 263 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Singergrp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 263 B or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (67%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Singergrp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.singergrp.com

www.singergrp.com

143 ms

style.css

style.css

14 ms

style.css

style.css

50 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

61 ms

desktop_style.css

desktop_style.css

52 ms

cf7msm.css

cf7msm.css

50 ms

styles.css

styles.css

51 ms

style_for_map.css

style_for_map.css

52 ms

calendar-jos.css

calendar-jos.css

58 ms

social_widget.css

social_widget.css

56 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

81 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

60 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

87 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

70 ms

popup.js

popup.js

68 ms

front_end_script.js

front_end_script.js

68 ms

main_front_end.js

main_front_end.js

69 ms

js

js

120 ms

if_gmap_front_end.js

if_gmap_front_end.js

85 ms

calendar.js

calendar.js

111 ms

calendar-setup.js

calendar-setup.js

81 ms

calendar_function.js

calendar_function.js

82 ms

external-tracking.min.js

external-tracking.min.js

111 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

67 ms

cleantalk_nocache.js

cleantalk_nocache.js

111 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

112 ms

cf7msm.js

cf7msm.js

111 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

114 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

115 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

59 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

113 ms

e-202240.js

e-202240.js

61 ms

ga.js

ga.js

103 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

227 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

208 ms

gen_204

gen_204

168 ms

singer-header-opt1.jpg

singer-header-opt1.jpg

141 ms

selected-nav-button.gif

selected-nav-button.gif

113 ms

singer-header-sprout.jpg

singer-header-sprout.jpg

111 ms

EW-2014-Enterprising-Women-234x300.png

EW-2014-Enterprising-Women-234x300.png

146 ms

Singer-home-callout-box.jpg

Singer-home-callout-box.jpg

144 ms

whats-in-the-gap-image.jpg

whats-in-the-gap-image.jpg

112 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

140 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

142 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

143 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

63 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

20 ms

button_website-click-to-learn-more.png

button_website-click-to-learn-more.png

41 ms

singer-footer-background.jpg

singer-footer-background.jpg

41 ms

SEO Factors

singergrp.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Singergrp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Singergrp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

singergrp.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Singergrp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: