Tools & Wizards About Us
singleboersevergleich.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

singleboersevergleich.com

Singlebörsen Vergleich 2023: Test, Erfahrungen, Tipps

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

747 ms

Page Rendered

233 ms

singleboersevergleich.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to singleboersevergleich.com homepage info - get ready to check Singleboerse Vergleich best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about singleboersevergleich.com

SinglebörsenVergleich ►► Testberichte, Vergleich, Erfahrungen und Meinungen zu Singlebörsen, Datingseiten & Partnervermittlungen zur online Partnersuche

Visit singleboersevergleich.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Singleboersevergleich.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 980 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

singleboersevergleich.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,950 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.197

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

singleboersevergleich.com

86 ms

www.singleboersevergleich.com

134 ms

gdsr.css.php

57 ms

rating.css

80 ms

style.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Singleboersevergleich.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (265 ms) belongs to the original domain Singleboersevergleich.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 401.9 kB (66%)

Content Size

605.5 kB

After Optimization

203.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Singleboersevergleich.com main page is 605.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 406.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 29.6 kB
  • After minification 29.6 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 237 B

  • Original 55.9 kB
  • After minification 55.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Singleboerse Vergleich images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 281.8 kB

  • Original 406.4 kB
  • After minification 388.2 kB
  • After compression 124.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 281.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 97.3 kB

  • Original 113.6 kB
  • After minification 94.9 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Singleboersevergleich.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 97.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (69%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Singleboerse Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

singleboersevergleich.com

singleboersevergleich.com

86 ms

www.singleboersevergleich.com

www.singleboersevergleich.com

134 ms

gdsr.css.php

gdsr.css.php

57 ms

rating.css

rating.css

80 ms

style.css

style.css

83 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

114 ms

gdsr.js

gdsr.js

75 ms

q2w3-fixed-widget.min.js

q2w3-fixed-widget.min.js

81 ms

jquery-ui-1.7.1.min.js

jquery-ui-1.7.1.min.js

199 ms

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

143 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

150 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

147 ms

script.js

script.js

150 ms

plugin.css

plugin.css

181 ms

datatables.css

datatables.css

226 ms

2c-r-fixed.css

2c-r-fixed.css

182 ms

default.css

default.css

227 ms

user.css

user.css

231 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

248 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

251 ms

base.js

base.js

265 ms

reset.css

reset.css

72 ms

typography.css

typography.css

73 ms

forms.css

forms.css

69 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

50 ms

logo-sbv-256.png

logo-sbv-256.png

70 ms

form.jpg

form.jpg

91 ms

postbar.gif

postbar.gif

71 ms

topnav.jpg

topnav.jpg

91 ms

content-bg.jpg

content-bg.jpg

49 ms

logo-parship.png

logo-parship.png

69 ms

heart-empty.png

heart-empty.png

104 ms

heart-full.png

heart-full.png

136 ms

logo-elitepartner.png

logo-elitepartner.png

90 ms

logo-edarling.png

logo-edarling.png

139 ms

logo-lovepoint.png

logo-lovepoint.png

90 ms

logo-joyclub.png

logo-joyclub.png

101 ms

logo-secret.png

logo-secret.png

158 ms

logo-bildkontakte.png

logo-bildkontakte.png

93 ms

logo-neu.png

logo-neu.png

162 ms

logo-freenet.png

logo-freenet.png

104 ms

feed-title-white.jpg

feed-title-white.jpg

170 ms

sbv-10-schritte-sbar.png

sbv-10-schritte-sbar.png

207 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

collect

collect

65 ms

Accessibility Review

singleboersevergleich.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

singleboersevergleich.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

singleboersevergleich.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Singleboersevergleich.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Singleboersevergleich.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

singleboersevergleich.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Singleboerse Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: