Tools & Wizards About Us
singleufabet.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

singleufabet.com

スクラップ処分はもったいない！知って得するダンプ買取の基礎知識をご紹介｜ダンプ買取の基礎知識2023年8月更新

Page Load Speed

774 ms in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

521 ms

Page Rendered

200 ms

singleufabet.com screenshot

About Website

Visit singleufabet.com now to see the best up-to-date Singleufabet content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about singleufabet.com

このサイトでは、ダンプ買取を利用する際に必要な基礎知識をそれぞれの項目に基づいて詳細に紹介しています。

Visit singleufabet.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Singleufabet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 721 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

singleufabet.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.098

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

singleufabet.com

53 ms

singleufabet.com

185 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

37 ms

style.min.css

45 ms

style.css

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Singleufabet.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (185 ms) belongs to the original domain Singleufabet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 217.1 kB (80%)

Content Size

272.9 kB

After Optimization

55.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Singleufabet.com main page is 272.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 163.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 9.4 kB
  • After minification 8.4 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 71.6 kB

  • Original 99.6 kB
  • After minification 98.1 kB
  • After compression 27.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 71.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 138.7 kB

  • Original 163.9 kB
  • After minification 140.5 kB
  • After compression 25.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Singleufabet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 138.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (47%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Singleufabet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

singleufabet.com

singleufabet.com

53 ms

singleufabet.com

singleufabet.com

185 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

37 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

45 ms

style.css

style.css

57 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

40 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

42 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

72 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

55 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

93 ms

jquery.jplayer.min.js

jquery.jplayer.min.js

109 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

108 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

108 ms

s-right-s2.png

s-right-s2.png

96 ms

s-left.png

s-left.png

96 ms

thumb-medium.png

thumb-medium.png

95 ms

titillium-light-webfont.svg

titillium-light-webfont.svg

28 ms

titillium-regular-webfont.svg

titillium-regular-webfont.svg

28 ms

titillium-semibold-webfont.svg

titillium-semibold-webfont.svg

28 ms

titillium-lightitalic-webfont.svg

titillium-lightitalic-webfont.svg

27 ms

titillium-regularitalic-webfont.svg

titillium-regularitalic-webfont.svg

27 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

8 ms

titillium-light-webfont.woff

titillium-light-webfont.woff

8 ms

titillium-regular-webfont.woff

titillium-regular-webfont.woff

9 ms

titillium-semibold-webfont.woff

titillium-semibold-webfont.woff

8 ms

titillium-lightitalic-webfont.woff

titillium-lightitalic-webfont.woff

8 ms

titillium-regularitalic-webfont.woff

titillium-regularitalic-webfont.woff

11 ms

Accessibility Review

singleufabet.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

singleufabet.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

singleufabet.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Singleufabet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Singleufabet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

singleufabet.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Singleufabet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: