1.8 sec in total
273 ms
1.2 sec
307 ms
Visit siptar.com now to see the best up-to-date Siptar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about siptar.com
Visit siptar.comWe analyzed Siptar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
siptar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value4.0 s
88/100
10%
273 ms
25 ms
255 ms
251 ms
128 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Siptar.com, 12% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (561 ms) belongs to the original domain Siptar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 335.4 kB (33%)
1.0 MB
678.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Siptar.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 709.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 97.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Siptar needs image optimization as it can save up to 97.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 102.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 129.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siptar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 129.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (30%)
27
19
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Siptar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
siptar.com
273 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
255 ms
responsive.css
251 ms
nivoslider.css
128 ms
jquery.min.js
312 ms
jquery.bxSlider.min.js
128 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
190 ms
jquery.blackandwhite.min.js
188 ms
js_func.js
189 ms
body.jpg
196 ms
logo.png
201 ms
sprite.png
200 ms
shadow.png
197 ms
loading.gif
198 ms
home4_slide_1.jpg
202 ms
home4_slide_2.jpg
200 ms
home4_slide_3.jpg
198 ms
home4_slide_4.jpg
439 ms
text_bar2.png
203 ms
siptar.jpg
561 ms
social_shadow.png
203 ms
social_bg.png
255 ms
white_dot.png
255 ms
text_bar_shadow2.png
257 ms
text_bar_shadow3.png
256 ms
siptar.com
389 ms
arrows.png
326 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
9 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
18 ms
lILlYDvubYemzYzN7GbLkInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
19 ms
PIPMHY90P7jtyjpXuZ2cLKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
22 ms
widget_v2.134.js
37 ms
siptar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
siptar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
siptar.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siptar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Siptar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siptar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Siptar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: