Tools & Wizards About Us
sisterson.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

sisterson.com

Home | Sisterson

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

104 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

393 ms

sisterson.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sisterson.com homepage info - get ready to check Sisterson best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about sisterson.com

Visit sisterson.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sisterson.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sisterson.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,110 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sisterson.com

104 ms

www.sisterson.com

434 ms

js

55 ms

bootstrap.min.css

39 ms

fontawesome.min.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Sisterson.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (434 ms) belongs to the original domain Sisterson.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 146.3 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

857.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sisterson.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 789.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 26.2 kB

  • Original 33.3 kB
  • After minification 31.5 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 73.1 kB

  • Original 789.5 kB
  • After minification 716.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sisterson images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 27.4 kB

  • Original 114.0 kB
  • After minification 113.9 kB
  • After compression 86.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 19.6 kB

  • Original 67.0 kB
  • After minification 67.0 kB
  • After compression 47.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sisterson.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (53%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sisterson. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sisterson.com

sisterson.com

104 ms

www.sisterson.com

www.sisterson.com

434 ms

js

js

55 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

39 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

77 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

104 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

123 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

125 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

162 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

128 ms

jquery.ba.loadmore.min.js

jquery.ba.loadmore.min.js

127 ms

jquery.ba.ajax.form.js

jquery.ba.ajax.form.js

133 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

152 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

158 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

157 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

191 ms

aos.min.css

aos.min.css

173 ms

aos.min.js

aos.min.js

184 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

188 ms

theme.css

theme.css

201 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

199 ms

utils.js

utils.js

203 ms

main.js

main.js

213 ms

api.js

api.js

44 ms

main.js

main.js

244 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

248 ms

jquery.block-hover.js

jquery.block-hover.js

246 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

69 ms

home_istock-1142683329.jpg

home_istock-1142683329.jpg

75 ms

edge-bottom.svg

edge-bottom.svg

67 ms

aa-home-image.jpg

aa-home-image.jpg

69 ms

ten-key_istock-184924380-500x400.jpg

ten-key_istock-184924380-500x400.jpg

71 ms

consulting-photo-home.jpg

consulting-photo-home.jpg

70 ms

edge-top.svg

edge-top.svg

71 ms

i-employee.svg

i-employee.svg

72 ms

wind2.svg

wind2.svg

73 ms

i-trusts.svg

i-trusts.svg

75 ms

i-manufacturing.svg

i-manufacturing.svg

76 ms

i-not-for-profit.svg

i-not-for-profit.svg

115 ms

i-investment.svg

i-investment.svg

113 ms

i-estate.svg

i-estate.svg

114 ms

i-growth.svg

i-growth.svg

116 ms

utb-photo.jpg

utb-photo.jpg

124 ms

history-try-crop.jpg

history-try-crop.jpg

153 ms

i-culture.svg

i-culture.svg

121 ms

i-life.svg

i-life.svg

125 ms

i-team.svg

i-team.svg

122 ms

i-careers.svg

i-careers.svg

123 ms

featured_nfp-blog-image.jpg

featured_nfp-blog-image.jpg

182 ms

featured_ebp-blog-image.jpg

featured_ebp-blog-image.jpg

182 ms

featured_tax-blog-image.jpg

featured_tax-blog-image.jpg

154 ms

featured_nfp-blog-image.jpg

featured_nfp-blog-image.jpg

184 ms

AGN.jpg

AGN.jpg

151 ms

AT-Best-Firms-to-Work-For-Logo-2024.png

AT-Best-Firms-to-Work-For-Logo-2024.png

182 ms

list-marker.png

list-marker.png

175 ms

ralewaybold.woff

ralewaybold.woff

112 ms

ralewaysemibold.woff

ralewaysemibold.woff

168 ms

ralewayregular.woff

ralewayregular.woff

177 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

177 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

178 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

141 ms

agn.jpg

agn.jpg

74 ms

at-best-firms-to-work-for-logo-2024.png

at-best-firms-to-work-for-logo-2024.png

97 ms

Accessibility Review

sisterson.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sisterson.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sisterson.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sisterson.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sisterson.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sisterson.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sisterson. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: