Tools & Wizards About Us
sisterwives.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

sisterwives.us

Sister Wives | Polygamy Dating and Matchmaking Service

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

97 ms

Resources Loaded

961 ms

Page Rendered

772 ms

sisterwives.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sister Wives content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sisterwives.us

Polygamy Dating just got easier. Founded in 2008, Sister Wives has over 15 years of poly dating experience. Find or become a sister wife today!

Visit sisterwives.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Sisterwives.us page load time and found that the first response time was 97 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sisterwives.us performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,150 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sisterwives.us

97 ms

sisterwives.com

198 ms

www.sisterwives.com

243 ms

gtm.js

80 ms

js

121 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sisterwives.us, 90% (70 requests) were made to Sisterwives.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (367 ms) relates to the external source Sisterwives.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.5 kB (40%)

Content Size

365.5 kB

After Optimization

220.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sisterwives.us main page is 365.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 261.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 50.4 kB

  • Original 68.5 kB
  • After minification 68.5 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 21 B

  • Original 7.4 kB
  • After minification 7.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sister Wives images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 94.9 kB

  • Original 261.1 kB
  • After minification 261.1 kB
  • After compression 166.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 94.9 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 109 B

  • Original 28.5 kB
  • After minification 28.4 kB
  • After compression 28.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sisterwives.us has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (52%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sister Wives. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sisterwives.us

sisterwives.us

97 ms

sisterwives.com

sisterwives.com

198 ms

www.sisterwives.com

www.sisterwives.com

243 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

80 ms

js

js

121 ms

main.css

main.css

42 ms

custom.css

custom.css

30 ms

join.css

join.css

56 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

74 ms

slider.webp

slider.webp

110 ms

sliderMobil.webp

sliderMobil.webp

367 ms

user.svg

user.svg

76 ms

emailInput.svg

emailInput.svg

101 ms

padlock.svg

padlock.svg

105 ms

facebookicon.svg

facebookicon.svg

105 ms

googleicon.svg

googleicon.svg

158 ms

appleicon.svg

appleicon.svg

107 ms

like.svg

like.svg

113 ms

shield.svg

shield.svg

109 ms

wine-glasses.svg

wine-glasses.svg

116 ms

bg.svg

bg.svg

155 ms

woman.svg

woman.svg

137 ms

photo.svg

photo.svg

143 ms

male.svg

male.svg

151 ms

heart.svg

heart.svg

158 ms

position.svg

position.svg

160 ms

password.svg

password.svg

157 ms

best.svg

best.svg

162 ms

smartphone.svg

smartphone.svg

161 ms

p01.webp

p01.webp

164 ms

baloon.png

baloon.png

238 ms

circleImg.webp

circleImg.webp

165 ms

bgBanner.webp

bgBanner.webp

167 ms

help.svg

help.svg

165 ms

f01.webp

f01.webp

167 ms

f02.webp

f02.webp

196 ms

f03.webp

f03.webp

167 ms

f04.webp

f04.webp

168 ms

f05.svg

f05.svg

170 ms

icon-left.svg

icon-left.svg

178 ms

firebase-app-compat.js

firebase-app-compat.js

77 ms

firebase-auth-compat.js

firebase-auth-compat.js

94 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

159 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

175 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

150 ms

main.js

main.js

135 ms

ow.js

ow.js

135 ms

jquery.mousewheel.js

jquery.mousewheel.js

111 ms

jquery.jscrollpane.js

jquery.jscrollpane.js

176 ms

skadate.js

skadate.js

111 ms

script.js

script.js

119 ms

howler.min.js

howler.min.js

116 ms

videoim_request.js

videoim_request.js

119 ms

bookmarks.js

bookmarks.js

129 ms

fb.js

fb.js

125 ms

auth.js

auth.js

158 ms

base_field_validators.js

base_field_validators.js

133 ms

jquery.emojipicker.js

jquery.emojipicker.js

124 ms

jquery.emojis.js

jquery.emojis.js

130 ms

emojiPicker.js

emojiPicker.js

132 ms

b01.webp

b01.webp

183 ms

b02.webp

b02.webp

187 ms

b03.webp

b03.webp

179 ms

b04.webp

b04.webp

203 ms

icon-right.svg

icon-right.svg

191 ms

app.svg

app.svg

182 ms

google.svg

google.svg

187 ms

pinterest.svg

pinterest.svg

190 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

194 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

192 ms

youtube.svg

youtube.svg

187 ms

reddit.svg

reddit.svg

188 ms

tumblr.svg

tumblr.svg

201 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

185 ms

checked.svg

checked.svg

183 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

37 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

4 ms

26 ms

Accessibility Review

sisterwives.us accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sisterwives.us best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sisterwives.us SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sisterwives.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sisterwives.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sisterwives.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sister Wives. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: