Access site-maker.com. Web Design, Glendale, Burbank, Montrose, La Crescenta, small business website-design

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.5 s

7/100

10%

site-maker.com

562 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

81 ms

layerslider.css

145 ms

css

30 ms

style.min.css

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Site-maker.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (562 ms) belongs to the original domain Site-maker.com.

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Site-maker.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 81.5 kB

Original 102.7 kB
After minification 101.9 kB
After compression 21.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

Original 3.3 MB
After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Site Maker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

Original 379.0 kB
After minification 379.0 kB
After compression 372.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

Original 101.9 kB
After minification 101.7 kB
After compression 90.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Site-maker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Site Maker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Site-maker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Site-maker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

site-maker.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Site Maker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Web Design, Glendale, Burbank, Montrose, La Crescenta, small business website-design

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

site-maker.com

wp-emoji-release.min.js

layerslider.css

css

style.min.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

site-maker.com

wp-emoji-release.min.js

layerslider.css

css

style.min.css

styles.css

tp_twitter_plugin.css

rs6.css

style.css

base.css

layout.css

shortcodes.css

animations.min.css

jquery.ui.all.css

jplayer.blue.monday.css

responsive.css

css

jquery.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

layerslider.utils.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.transitions.js

rbtools.min.js

rs6.min.js

css

scripts.js

core.min.js

mouse.min.js

sortable.min.js

tabs.min.js

accordion.min.js

plugins.js

menu.js

animations.min.js

jplayer.min.js

translate3d.js

scripts.js

comment-reply.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

CAProfDesign-Logo2.png

home1.jpg

Two-Businessmen.jpg

Cafe-owners-2.jpg