Tools & Wizards About Us
sitec.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

sitec.de

Innovative Sicherheitslösungen für industrielle Anwendungen | SITEC

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

288 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

394 ms

sitec.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SITEC content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sitec.de

Entdecken Sie die fortschrittlichen Sicherheitssysteme von SITEC. Steigern Sie Schutz und Effizienz mit unseren modernen Technologien.

Visit sitec.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Sitec.de page load time and found that the first response time was 288 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sitec.de performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.265

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sitec.de

288 ms

www.sitec.de

681 ms

bootstrap.css

190 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

277 ms

flexslider.css

278 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Sitec.de, 34% (16 requests) were made to Cdn.sitec.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.sitec.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (82%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

313.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Sitec.de main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 84.8 kB

  • Original 99.7 kB
  • After minification 71.6 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.1 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 297.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SITEC needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 82% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 5.4 kB
  • After minification 3.5 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (56%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SITEC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sitec.de

sitec.de

288 ms

www.sitec.de

www.sitec.de

681 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

190 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

277 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

278 ms

d42b6e1bdf.css

d42b6e1bdf.css

279 ms

CustomBootstrap.css

CustomBootstrap.css

279 ms

Custom.css

Custom.css

281 ms

Responsive_fce_2c7eaf10aef4e034cab77d3190294575c2067aa3.css

Responsive_fce_2c7eaf10aef4e034cab77d3190294575c2067aa3.css

284 ms

Desktop.css

Desktop.css

369 ms

FrontendEditing.css

FrontendEditing.css

369 ms

News.css

News.css

370 ms

cookieman-theme.css

cookieman-theme.css

369 ms

Indexed_search_autocomplete.css

Indexed_search_autocomplete.css

373 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

469 ms

Jquery-3.2.1.min.js

Jquery-3.2.1.min.js

650 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

466 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

557 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

553 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

465 ms

main.js

main.js

559 ms

slider.js

slider.js

557 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

559 ms

cookieman.js

cookieman.js

647 ms

cookieman-theme.js

cookieman-theme.js

673 ms

cookieman-init.js

cookieman-init.js

673 ms

search_autocomplete.js

search_autocomplete.js

676 ms

startpage_door.png

startpage_door.png

1058 ms

csm_transfer_systems_876d6332c5.png

csm_transfer_systems_876d6332c5.png

729 ms

csm_personel_locks_652e4fd4a6.png

csm_personel_locks_652e4fd4a6.png

697 ms

csm_complete_systems_401641eff2.png

csm_complete_systems_401641eff2.png

715 ms

csm_P3300_offen_72e84ee378.png

csm_P3300_offen_72e84ee378.png

728 ms

csm_delta-intercom_4a2fb8a867.png

csm_delta-intercom_4a2fb8a867.png

218 ms

csm_partition_walls_afaf6e0dba.png

csm_partition_walls_afaf6e0dba.png

729 ms

csm_gates_c2a16d077d.png

csm_gates_c2a16d077d.png

1200 ms

protect_icon.svg

protect_icon.svg

723 ms

safty_icon.svg

safty_icon.svg

1131 ms

control_icon.svg

control_icon.svg

1125 ms

valence_icon.svg

valence_icon.svg

735 ms

funktionality_icon.svg

funktionality_icon.svg

739 ms

design_icon.svg

design_icon.svg

751 ms

csm_Darstellung_Leistungen_Alles_aus_einer_Hand_SITEC_19092022_WEB_36bbe6f4db.png

csm_Darstellung_Leistungen_Alles_aus_einer_Hand_SITEC_19092022_WEB_36bbe6f4db.png

1232 ms

Language-Select-Arrow-Down.svg

Language-Select-Arrow-Down.svg

183 ms

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

492 ms

OpenSans-Light.ttf

OpenSans-Light.ttf

496 ms

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

585 ms

search_autocomplete.js

search_autocomplete.js

970 ms

Accessibility Review

sitec.de accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sitec.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sitec.de SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitec.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitec.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sitec.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SITEC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: