Tools & Wizards About Us
sitefig.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

sitefig.eu

Sitefig - your site sorted: Continuous UX monitoring and auditing for large websites

Page Load Speed

899 ms in total

First Response

54 ms

Resources Loaded

532 ms

Page Rendered

313 ms

sitefig.eu screenshot

About Website

Visit sitefig.eu now to see the best up-to-date Sitefig content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sitefig.eu

Sitefig, your site sorted. Website auditing and monitoring.

Visit sitefig.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Sitefig.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 845 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sitefig.eu performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sitefig.eu

54 ms

index.css

30 ms

css2

33 ms

hello.js

54 ms

logo.svg

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Sitefig.eu, 50% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (76 ms) belongs to the original domain Sitefig.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 233.2 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

985.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Sitefig.eu main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 9.0 kB
  • After minification 9.0 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 227.4 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 980.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sitefig needs image optimization as it can save up to 227.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 24 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitefig. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

sitefig.eu

sitefig.eu

54 ms

index.css

index.css

30 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

hello.js

hello.js

54 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

43 ms

NtHkuqLnm_-1177.png

NtHkuqLnm_-1177.png

45 ms

-YfAu2lPp0-1133.png

-YfAu2lPp0-1133.png

64 ms

65T5nNxqly-1133.png

65T5nNxqly-1133.png

76 ms

mozilla-matjas.jpg

mozilla-matjas.jpg

53 ms

wasp-cloud.png

wasp-cloud.png

31 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

22 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

28 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

33 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

43 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

48 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

49 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

47 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

47 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

47 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6aX8.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6aX8.ttf

59 ms

Accessibility Review

sitefig.eu accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

sitefig.eu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

SEO Factors

sitefig.eu SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitefig.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitefig.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sitefig.eu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sitefig. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: