Tools & Wizards About Us
sitemark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

sitemark.com

Software for the Solar Site Lifecycle - Sitemark

Page Load Speed

679 ms in total

First Response

104 ms

Resources Loaded

460 ms

Page Rendered

115 ms

sitemark.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sitemark.com homepage info - get ready to check Sitemark best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about sitemark.com

Streamline and optimize the engineering, construction and operation of solar sites. Asset Owners, EPC contractors and O&M Providers.

Visit sitemark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sitemark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 575 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sitemark.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,440 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sitemark.com

104 ms

framework.css

48 ms

common.js

174 ms

home.css

95 ms

logo.gif

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Sitemark.com, 33% (3 requests) were made to Sitemark-us.s3.amazonaws.com and 22% (2 requests) were made to Sitemarkcom.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (174 ms) belongs to the original domain Sitemark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 98.8 kB (47%)

Content Size

209.8 kB

After Optimization

111.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sitemark.com main page is 209.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 119.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 5.1 kB
  • After minification 4.5 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 567 B, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 13 B

  • Original 73.0 kB
  • After minification 73.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sitemark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 85.8 kB

  • Original 119.8 kB
  • After minification 99.8 kB
  • After compression 34.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 11.9 kB
  • After minification 9.0 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitemark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitemark. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

www.sitemark.com

www.sitemark.com

104 ms

framework.css

framework.css

48 ms

common.js

common.js

174 ms

home.css

home.css

95 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

65 ms

btnsignup.gif

btnsignup.gif

57 ms

ga.js

ga.js

23 ms

example.jpg

example.jpg

67 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

24 ms

Accessibility Review

sitemark.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sitemark.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sitemark.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitemark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sitemark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sitemark.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sitemark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: