3.5 sec in total
18 ms
3.2 sec
355 ms
Visit siteselectorpro.com now to see the best up-to-date Siteselectorpro content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about siteselectorpro.com
Visit siteselectorpro.comWe analyzed Siteselectorpro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
siteselectorpro.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value31.2 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value2,060 ms
7/100
30%
Value1.121
1/100
15%
Value28.8 s
0/100
10%
18 ms
2245 ms
175 ms
149 ms
176 ms
Our browser made a total of 135 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Siteselectorpro.com, 75% (101 requests) were made to Xb50a3.p3cdn1.secureserver.net and 5% (7 requests) were made to Stcdn.leadconnectorhq.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Mylocationadvisor.com.
Page size can be reduced by 212.5 kB (12%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Siteselectorpro.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 171.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Siteselectorpro images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 39.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 851 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Siteselectorpro.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 109 (83%)
131
22
The browser has sent 131 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Siteselectorpro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 80 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
siteselectorpro.com
18 ms
mylocationadvisor.com
2245 ms
animate.min.css
175 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
149 ms
lc-public.css
176 ms
style.min.css
182 ms
latest.css
158 ms
live-site-control.css
171 ms
modules-style.css
165 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
176 ms
frontend.css
185 ms
front.min.css
200 ms
style.min.css
138 ms
css
65 ms
style.css
139 ms
jquery.min.js
143 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
142 ms
loader.js
127 ms
lc-public.js
158 ms
ie-compat.min.js
159 ms
js
99 ms
et-core-unified-23.min.css
185 ms
api.js
68 ms
form_embed.js
321 ms
css
68 ms
css
80 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
182 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
180 ms
slick.min.css
180 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
187 ms
jquery.exitintent.min.js
188 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
189 ms
coblocks-animation.js
188 ms
tiny-swiper.js
189 ms
coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js
318 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
313 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
336 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
322 ms
react.min.js
319 ms
hooks.min.js
318 ms
i18n.min.js
320 ms
url.min.js
322 ms
api-fetch.min.js
324 ms
react-dom.min.js
324 ms
dom-ready.min.js
327 ms
scc-c2.min.js
8 ms
tti.min.js
6 ms
a11y.min.js
241 ms
deprecated.min.js
236 ms
dom.min.js
225 ms
escape-html.min.js
222 ms
element.min.js
223 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
224 ms
keycodes.min.js
225 ms
priority-queue.min.js
217 ms
compose.min.js
223 ms
moment.min.js
208 ms
date.min.js
209 ms
html-entities.min.js
208 ms
primitives.min.js
192 ms
private-apis.min.js
227 ms
redux-routine.min.js
189 ms
data.min.js
179 ms
rich-text.min.js
169 ms
warning.min.js
170 ms
components.min.js
172 ms
blob.min.js
172 ms
autop.min.js
174 ms
block-serialization-default-parser.min.js
222 ms
shortcode.min.js
173 ms
blocks.min.js
177 ms
keyboard-shortcuts.min.js
63 ms
commands.min.js
50 ms
notices.min.js
58 ms
preferences-persistence.min.js
85 ms
preferences.min.js
77 ms
style-engine.min.js
67 ms
token-list.min.js
82 ms
wordcount.min.js
74 ms
block-editor.min.js
96 ms
core-data.min.js
92 ms
live-site-control.js
82 ms
magnific-popup.js
98 ms
slick.min.js
95 ms
counter-up.min.js
97 ms
frontend.js
102 ms
front.min.js
109 ms
scripts.min.js
108 ms
scripts.js
108 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
110 ms
magnific-popup.js
110 ms
easypiechart.js
118 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
123 ms
common.js
275 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
268 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
125 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
262 ms
sticky-elements.js
262 ms
LjUSa4yqViLN00F1oBog
309 ms
font
29 ms
font
36 ms
modules.woff
269 ms
font
45 ms
MLA-logo-DS-ltBlu-300.png
254 ms
CBC-Award-Logo-2022-Gold_RGB.png
255 ms
preloader.gif
255 ms
CREXI-PLAT-BROKER-2024.jpg
396 ms
CBC-Award-Logo-2023-Silver_CMYK-e1709529267357.png
254 ms
Generic-TPC-Logo-Circle-White-Font.png
250 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-602-23-late.css
97 ms
CBC-Award-Logo-2022-Gold_RGB-1.png
242 ms
TCP-plat.png
243 ms
Diamond_Society_Blue_RGB.png
245 ms
crexi-award.png
243 ms
ccim-logo-ne.png
231 ms
NVAR_logo-150.png
221 ms
MAREMA-logo.png
264 ms
regular.css
115 ms
solid.css
130 ms
brands.css
172 ms
iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.js
115 ms
pixel.js
118 ms
css
99 ms
css
99 ms
FormComponent.b571f7aa.css
168 ms
vue-multiselect.eb3eab67.css
175 ms
app.0cf81c7a.css
199 ms
TextElement.0b941f97.css
193 ms
TextBoxListElement.b602ad61.css
197 ms
OptionElement.05aaf420.css
186 ms
fbevents.js
14 ms
check-circle.c2914d05.svg
32 ms
font
4 ms
font
6 ms
font
7 ms
siteselectorpro.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
siteselectorpro.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
siteselectorpro.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Siteselectorpro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Siteselectorpro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
siteselectorpro.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Siteselectorpro. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: