6.2 sec in total
703 ms
2.9 sec
2.5 sec
Visit sitesmonitor.net now to see the best up-to-date Site S Monitor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sitesmonitor.net
SiteMonitor monitors your websites, hosts via http, https, ping, icmp, tcp and more.
Visit sitesmonitor.netWe analyzed Sitesmonitor.net page load time and found that the first response time was 703 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
sitesmonitor.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.329
35/100
15%
Value12.4 s
14/100
10%
703 ms
24 ms
35 ms
196 ms
174 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Sitesmonitor.net, 10% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (703 ms) belongs to the original domain Sitesmonitor.net.
Page size can be reduced by 902.8 kB (64%)
1.4 MB
508.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Sitesmonitor.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 963.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 164.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Site S Monitor needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 613.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 613.8 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 108.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitesmonitor.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (73%)
74
20
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Site S Monitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sitesmonitor.net
703 ms
css
24 ms
css
35 ms
styles.css
196 ms
cli-style.css
174 ms
pagenavi-css.css
155 ms
style.css
240 ms
fractionslider-style.css
183 ms
fractionslider.css
182 ms
ggren.css
229 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css
266 ms
jquery-1.9.0.min.js
387 ms
floatads.js
269 ms
cookielawinfo.js
270 ms
modernizr.custom.97074.js
365 ms
jquery.hoverdir.js
347 ms
tinynav.min.js
382 ms
jquery.fractionslider.js
383 ms
adsbygoogle.js
8 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
419 ms
platform.js
54 ms
addthis_widget.js
28 ms
jquery.form.min.js
414 ms
scripts.js
415 ms
general.js
415 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
415 ms
fraction-init.js
417 ms
bseven.init.js
415 ms
wp-embed.min.js
498 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js
497 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
499 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
497 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
collect
27 ms
page_bg.png
177 ms
sm_header1.png
133 ms
fs.spinner.gif
187 ms
bg.png
466 ms
bgc.png
464 ms
pulse11.png
465 ms
alert3.png
466 ms
report1.png
480 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
79 ms
qaDmg_CNIuBGdKmH4z3spA.ttf
80 ms
TitilliumText22L004-webfont.woff
433 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
432 ms
Chunkfive-webfont.woff
430 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
20 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
27 ms
fastbutton
312 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
292 ms
overlay.png
308 ms
300lo.json
138 ms
ca-pub-4354750894627308.js
252 ms
zrt_lookup.html
266 ms
show_ads_impl.js
176 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
128 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
129 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
150 ms
postmessageRelay
211 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
132 ms
ads
307 ms
osd.js
6 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
24 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
29 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
css
74 ms
m_js_controller.js
75 ms
abg.js
95 ms
favicon
127 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
125 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
71 ms
s
85 ms
x_button_blue2.png
74 ms
fql
118 ms
count.json
66 ms
info.json
69 ms
shares.json
59 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
10 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
8 ms
sitesmonitor.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
sitesmonitor.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
sitesmonitor.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitesmonitor.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitesmonitor.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sitesmonitor.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Site S Monitor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: