3.5 sec in total
57 ms
2.7 sec
746 ms
Click here to check amazing Site Stacker content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sitestacker.com
You have an important mission. But your software setup is expensive, cluttered, and divided. That’s why we exist.
Visit sitestacker.comWe analyzed Sitestacker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
sitestacker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.6 s
0/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value40.2 s
0/100
10%
Value1,320 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.109
87/100
15%
Value238.5 s
0/100
10%
57 ms
678 ms
58 ms
57 ms
57 ms
Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Sitestacker.com, 14% (16 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Sitestacker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 472.0 kB (20%)
2.4 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Sitestacker.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 320.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 320.2 kB or 44% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 98.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Site Stacker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 25.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitestacker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (69%)
112
35
The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Site Stacker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sitestacker.com
57 ms
sitestacker.com
678 ms
css-variables.css
58 ms
jquery.customAlert.css
57 ms
popup.css
57 ms
search-field.css
56 ms
font-awesome.min.css
69 ms
pikaday.min.css
114 ms
Task.css
57 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
81 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
127 ms
ext-theme.css
113 ms
template-all.css
89 ms
custom-icons.css
111 ms
Router.js
71 ms
jed.min.js
80 ms
Translator.js
87 ms
jquery.min.js
126 ms
jquery.sitestacker.js
142 ms
StartCampaign.js
158 ms
Recaptcha.js
160 ms
jquery.customAlert.js
158 ms
Register.js
157 ms
Router.js
158 ms
SearchField.js
156 ms
js
300 ms
js
341 ms
browser.js
163 ms
react.production.min.js
122 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
86 ms
prop-types.min.js
141 ms
util.js
331 ms
jquery.ui.min.js
341 ms
jquery.ui.widget.js
340 ms
jquery.fileupload.js
333 ms
jquery.iframe-transport.js
329 ms
jquery.fileupload-process.js
332 ms
jquery.fileupload-validate.js
339 ms
moment.min.js
154 ms
lodash.min.js
154 ms
tinymce.min.js
326 ms
pikaday.min.js
297 ms
Task.js
338 ms
Hooks.js
338 ms
CustomAlert.js
337 ms
TaskDocusign.js
459 ms
TaskFile.js
461 ms
TaskForm.js
462 ms
TaskMessage.js
457 ms
TaskNote.js
461 ms
TaskRelationship.js
460 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
153 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
325 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
153 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
326 ms
css2
135 ms
d08e5ef8f9.js
136 ms
style.min.css
412 ms
style.css
413 ms
TaskStandard.js
413 ms
TaskFormFieldTypes.js
414 ms
TaskFormField.js
411 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
93 ms
TaskField.js
406 ms
TaskFormMultiField.js
404 ms
TaskFormFieldset.js
395 ms
axios.min.js
256 ms
TaskFormMultiFieldset.js
387 ms
1.js
365 ms
CsrfTokenHandler.js
366 ms
jquery.set-children-min-height.js
355 ms
jquery.wait-until-exists.js
338 ms
skrollr.js
339 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
179 ms
template.js
333 ms
template.js
333 ms
SendEmail.js
332 ms
Popups.js
343 ms
api.js
305 ms
hqdefault.jpg
212 ms
SS%20logo%20white.png
21 ms
SS%20logo%20black.png
22 ms
Wycliffe.png
100 ms
TWR.png
99 ms
AG.png
99 ms
WGM%20logo.png
100 ms
Childcare%20Logo.png
99 ms
Global%20Out.%20Logo.png
101 ms
The%20Solution%20Collage.png
171 ms
TWR%20Give%20Slider%20FINAL%20VERSION.gif
167 ms
Online%20Giving%20Icon.png
161 ms
Website%20Publishing%20Icon.png
160 ms
Ethnos%20Visual.gif
391 ms
Charts%20and%20Graphs.gif
199 ms
Donor%20Management%20Icon.png
174 ms
Automation%20Icon.png
175 ms
Task%20List.gif
293 ms
Childcare%20Worldwide.gif
1529 ms
Sponsorship%20Icon.png
200 ms
Online%20Giving%20Card.png
207 ms
Web%20Builder%20Card.png
208 ms
Ministry%20CRM%20Card.png
230 ms
Automation%20Card.png
292 ms
Child%20Sponsorship%20Card.png
291 ms
SS%20Logo%20(2022).png
291 ms
recaptcha__en.js
98 ms
icon-zoom-reset-search-header.png
331 ms
brown-button-gradient-alt.gif
333 ms
Soft%20Blue%20Footer.jpg
270 ms
Slider%20Hero%20BG%202.png
268 ms
font
74 ms
Consultation%20BG%20new.jpg
82 ms
Linearicons.ttf
204 ms
reb2b.js.gz
315 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
197 ms
getSettings.json
683 ms
main.js
38 ms
sitestacker.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sitestacker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sitestacker.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitestacker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitestacker.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
sitestacker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Site Stacker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: