Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

sitewachter.nl

Sitewachter | Uw eigen website. Compleet, professioneel en niet duur

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

285 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

111 ms

sitewachter.nl screenshot

About Website

Visit sitewachter.nl now to see the best up-to-date Sitewachter content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sitewachter.nl

Sitewachter bouwt een complete website met HTML en CSS voor u. Voordelig, maar wel professioneel, gebruiksvriendelijk en geoptimaliseerd voor zoekmachines.

Visit sitewachter.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Sitewachter.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sitewachter.nl performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sitewachter.nl

285 ms

sitewachter.nl

377 ms

www.sitewachter.nl

371 ms

www.sitewachter.nl

570 ms

font-awesome.min.css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Sitewachter.nl, 4% (1 request) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Rum-static.pingdom.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (570 ms) belongs to the original domain Sitewachter.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

524.1 kB

After Optimization

360.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Sitewachter.nl main page is 524.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 270.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 157.0 kB

  • Original 206.8 kB
  • After minification 205.8 kB
  • After compression 49.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 32.5 kB
  • After minification 29.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sitewachter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 270.2 kB
  • After minification 270.2 kB
  • After compression 269.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 14.7 kB
  • After minification 14.7 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitewachter.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (56%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitewachter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sitewachter.nl accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

sitewachter.nl best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

sitewachter.nl SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitewachter.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitewachter.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sitewachter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: