Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

sivel.net

Sivel.net

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

779 ms

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

sivel.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sivel content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sivel.net

Visit sivel.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Sivel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sivel.net performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sivel.net

77 ms

bootstrap.min.css

86 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

34 ms

docs.css

37 ms

prettify.css

321 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Sivel.net, 18% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (404 ms) belongs to the original domain Sivel.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 199.9 kB (70%)

Content Size

285.4 kB

After Optimization

85.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Sivel.net main page is 285.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 146.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 48.9 kB

  • Original 65.0 kB
  • After minification 57.3 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 12.8 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sivel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 29.6 kB

  • Original 61.4 kB
  • After minification 61.3 kB
  • After compression 31.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.6 kB or 48% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 121.5 kB

  • Original 146.1 kB
  • After minification 137.9 kB
  • After compression 24.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sivel.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 121.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (75%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sivel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sivel.net accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

sivel.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sivel.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sivel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sivel.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sivel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: