4.7 sec in total
452 ms
3.2 sec
1 sec
Welcome to sixtus.cc homepage info - get ready to check Sixtus best content right away, or after learning these important things about sixtus.cc
Former domain of a personal tech blog of a German journalist and author.
Visit sixtus.ccWe analyzed Sixtus.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 452 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
sixtus.cc performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value2.3 s
98/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value4.1 s
87/100
10%
452 ms
24 ms
546 ms
18 ms
107 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Sixtus.cc, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Sixtus.net.
Page size can be reduced by 252.4 kB (44%)
575.6 kB
323.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Sixtus.cc main page is 575.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 383.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sixtus needs image optimization as it can save up to 123.4 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 94.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 94.8 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sixtus.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
97
97
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sixtus. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
sixtus.net
452 ms
css
24 ms
jquery.js
546 ms
jquery.color-2.1.2.min.js
18 ms
font-awesome.min.css
107 ms
sixtus.css
211 ms
sixtus-start-bg-ani.gif
1153 ms
twitter.png
110 ms
facebook.png
208 ms
googleplus.png
210 ms
flickr.png
213 ms
instagram.png
210 ms
foursquare.png
210 ms
youtube.png
316 ms
rss.png
315 ms
xing.png
316 ms
linkedin.png
315 ms
runtastic.png
317 ms
spotify.png
418 ms
01_Ueber_i.png
420 ms
02_Blog_i.png
416 ms
03_Bewegtbilder_i.png
418 ms
04_Schreiberei_i.png
420 ms
05_Vortraege_i.png
519 ms
06_Fotografie_i.png
521 ms
07_Wo_i.png
520 ms
08_Kontakt_i.png
522 ms
01_Ueber.png
523 ms
02_Blog.png
629 ms
03_Bewegtbilder.png
623 ms
04_Schreiberei.png
628 ms
05_Vortraege.png
624 ms
06_Fotografie.png
623 ms
08_Kontakt.png
727 ms
g-twitter.png
707 ms
g-facebook.png
709 ms
g-googleplus.png
709 ms
g-flickr.png
711 ms
g-instagram.png
810 ms
g-foursquare.png
811 ms
g-youtube.png
812 ms
g-rss.png
816 ms
SHXJdWnWW6HDq-6DpcG8PxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
34 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
collect
14 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
957 ms
g-xing.png
760 ms
g-linkedin.png
769 ms
g-runtastic.png
803 ms
g-spotify.png
803 ms
3sat.png
904 ms
aktion-mensch.png
810 ms
arte-future.png
799 ms
aspekte.png
801 ms
auslandsjournal.png
852 ms
bpb_logo_rgb.png
867 ms
br.png
772 ms
brandeins.png
772 ms
ct.png
765 ms
das_kleine_fernsehspiel_zdf_header_01.png
829 ms
debug.png
852 ms
ejc.png
766 ms
european-webvideo-academy.png
766 ms
fast-forward-science.png
770 ms
faz.png
766 ms
focus.png
828 ms
fr.png
751 ms
fraunhofer-iao.png
765 ms
goldenes-brett.png
764 ms
grimme-akademie.png
763 ms
handelsblatt.png
765 ms
heise.png
727 ms
heute-journal.png
748 ms
heute.png
762 ms
ihk-stuttgart.png
762 ms
kulturstiftung-des-bundes.png
763 ms
lfm-nrw.png
664 ms
maz.png
725 ms
mdr.png
746 ms
medium-magazin.png
757 ms
neon.png
641 ms
pm.png
635 ms
politik-digital.png
591 ms
republica14.png
628 ms
spiegel-online.png
623 ms
tages-anzeiger.png
594 ms
tagesspiegel.png
608 ms
technology-review.png
600 ms
total-recall.png
595 ms
viral-video-award.png
634 ms
waz.png
630 ms
volle-kanne.png
627 ms
webvideopreis.png
639 ms
wired.png
638 ms
wirtschaftswoche.png
635 ms
wiso.png
633 ms
zdf-info.png
629 ms
zdf.png
628 ms
zeit-online.png
641 ms
sixtus.cc accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sixtus.cc best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
sixtus.cc SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sixtus.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Sixtus.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sixtus.cc
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sixtus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: