3.6 sec in total
383 ms
2.9 sec
342 ms
Welcome to sixtyseven.com homepage info - get ready to check Sixtyseven best content right away, or after learning these important things about sixtyseven.com
Communicatiebureau voor design en (online) merkbeleving. Niet bang om meer op te vallen als merk? Kom bij ons langs in Beverwijk en deel je ambitie!
Visit sixtyseven.comWe analyzed Sixtyseven.com page load time and found that the first response time was 383 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
sixtyseven.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value14.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value3,090 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.056
98/100
15%
Value16.2 s
5/100
10%
383 ms
641 ms
69 ms
106 ms
183 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Sixtyseven.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sixtyseven.com.
Page size can be reduced by 318.3 kB (16%)
1.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Sixtyseven.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sixtyseven images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 202.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 202.2 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sixtyseven.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (69%)
70
22
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sixtyseven. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sixtyseven.com
383 ms
www.sixtyseven.com
641 ms
gtm.js
69 ms
cookie.css
106 ms
style.css
183 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
309 ms
grid-system.css
313 ms
style.css
388 ms
header-layout-centered-menu.css
308 ms
element-recent-posts.css
311 ms
css
33 ms
responsive.css
409 ms
ascend.css
398 ms
menu-dynamic.css
394 ms
js_composer.min.css
395 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
480 ms
style.css
475 ms
style.css
487 ms
css
46 ms
cookie.js
485 ms
jquery.min.js
566 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
513 ms
picturefill.min.js
561 ms
front_style.css
565 ms
style-non-critical.css
566 ms
magnific.css
567 ms
core.css
618 ms
front.js
647 ms
lottie.js
996 ms
isotope.min.js
666 ms
portfolio.js
665 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
666 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
723 ms
priority.js
734 ms
transit.min.js
759 ms
waypoints.js
756 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
759 ms
hoverintent.min.js
828 ms
magnific.js
823 ms
anime.min.js
844 ms
superfish.js
852 ms
landing
177 ms
js
58 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
init.js
1026 ms
collect
3 ms
touchswipe.min.js
741 ms
collect
518 ms
main.js
634 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
633 ms
base.css
474 ms
768max.css
533 ms
768up.css
572 ms
1040up.css
554 ms
logo.png
109 ms
sixtyseven-web-design-branding.png
113 ms
fold.png
109 ms
gp-groot-case-uitgelichte-afbeelding-600x427.jpg
303 ms
NorthC_Beeldtaal_uitgelichte-afbeelding.jpg
302 ms
gscounsil-uitgelichte-afbeelding-600x427.jpg
156 ms
img-all-clients-2_02.jpg
302 ms
img-all-clients-3_02.jpg
301 ms
img-all-clients-1_02.jpg
302 ms
img-all-clients-4_02.jpg
303 ms
img-all-clients-5_02.jpg
391 ms
img-all-clients-6_02.jpg
408 ms
img-all-clients-7_02.jpg
391 ms
img-all-clients-8_02.jpg
392 ms
bg-home-hero-video-poster.jpg
458 ms
kop-koffie.png
460 ms
ping.js
131 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
130 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
200 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
218 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
219 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
219 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
220 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
220 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
218 ms
icomoon.woff
391 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
555 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
89 ms
sixtyseven.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sixtyseven.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sixtyseven.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sixtyseven.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sixtyseven.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sixtyseven.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sixtyseven. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: