8.4 sec in total
300 ms
7.4 sec
666 ms
Welcome to skimlinksvsviglink.info homepage info - get ready to check Skim Links Vs Vig Link best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about skimlinksvsviglink.info
VigLink vs SkimLinks comparison.
Visit skimlinksvsviglink.infoWe analyzed Skimlinksvsviglink.info page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 8.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
skimlinksvsviglink.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value7,190 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
300 ms
386 ms
17 ms
24 ms
10 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Skimlinksvsviglink.info, 9% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to C.betrad.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.4 sec) relates to the external source Reddit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 754.0 kB (58%)
1.3 MB
555.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Skimlinksvsviglink.info main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 930.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 151.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Skim Links Vs Vig Link images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 598.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 598.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (66%)
89
30
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Skim Links Vs Vig Link. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
skimlinksvsviglink.info
300 ms
piwik.js
386 ms
show_ads.js
17 ms
ref-banners.js
24 ms
addthis_widget.js
10 ms
19481X948976.skimlinks.js
109 ms
120x90.png
209 ms
ca-pub-8068977927667500.js
172 ms
zrt_lookup.html
244 ms
show_ads_impl.js
163 ms
api
143 ms
white.png
137 ms
widget.php
111 ms
api
105 ms
ads
244 ms
osd.js
21 ms
api
65 ms
ads
213 ms
widget.php
138 ms
106 ms
300lo.json
76 ms
all.js&version=v2.0
480 ms
widgets.js
255 ms
plusone.js
82 ms
64 ms
m_js_controller.js
203 ms
abg.js
307 ms
ads
399 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
122 ms
widget.php
120 ms
0_jFwqgyZG.jpg
555 ms
a.gif
353 ms
bcs0
499 ms
creative_add_on.js
511 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
189 ms
265 ms
jquery.min.js
541 ms
link
187 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
398 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
486 ms
fastbutton
599 ms
favicon
373 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
373 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
214 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
465 ms
x_button_blue2.png
159 ms
s
151 ms
76 ms
a.gif
142 ms
creative_add_on.js
274 ms
0_jFwqgyZG.jpg
361 ms
bcs0
182 ms
269 ms
xd_arbiter.php
158 ms
xd_arbiter.php
379 ms
surly.js
236 ms
dvtp_src.js
234 ms
postmessageRelay
351 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
108 ms
305 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
118 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
111 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
264 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
81 ms
ba.html
130 ms
4.gif
287 ms
dvtp_src_internal26.js
123 ms
fql
264 ms
count.json
262 ms
info.json
5370 ms
shares.json
217 ms
p.skimresources.com
243 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
201 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
198 ms
track.php
192 ms
t2tv7.html
172 ms
visit.js
88 ms
2532.js
43 ms
jot
116 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
16 ms
avs5639.js
6 ms
event.gif
64 ms
query.js
47 ms
event.jpg
40 ms
query.js
27 ms
event.gif
54 ms
box_19_top-right.png
30 ms
ci.png
15 ms
activeview
13 ms
like.php
60 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
137 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
150 ms
skimlinksvsviglink.info accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
skimlinksvsviglink.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
skimlinksvsviglink.info SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Skimlinksvsviglink.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Skimlinksvsviglink.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
skimlinksvsviglink.info
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Skim Links Vs Vig Link. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: