Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

skyscanner.de

Skyscanner

Page Load Speed

791 ms in total

First Response

173 ms

Resources Loaded

548 ms

Page Rendered

70 ms

skyscanner.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to skyscanner.de homepage info - get ready to check Skyscanner best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about skyscanner.de

Visit skyscanner.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Skyscanner.de page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 618 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

skyscanner.de performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value27.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value99,690 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value139.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.skyscanner.de

173 ms

jp67.js

125 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Skyscanner.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (173 ms) belongs to the original domain Skyscanner.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 494.5 kB (66%)

Content Size

744.8 kB

After Optimization

250.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Skyscanner.de main page is 744.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 691.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 611 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 750 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 611 B or 45% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 51.6 kB
  • After minification 50.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Skyscanner images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 492.4 kB

  • Original 691.8 kB
  • After minification 691.4 kB
  • After compression 199.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 492.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Skyscanner. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

skyscanner.de accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

skyscanner.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

skyscanner.de SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Skyscanner.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Skyscanner.de main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Skyscanner. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: