2.3 sec in total
135 ms
1.9 sec
257 ms
Visit sleep.how now to see the best up-to-date Sleep content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sleep.how
Quality sleep leads to quality living. We’re here to help you do both. Your everyday guide to a better night’s sleep and overall well-being.
Visit sleep.howWe analyzed Sleep.how page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
sleep.how performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.172
69/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
135 ms
265 ms
23 ms
227 ms
22 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Sleep.how, 30% (10 requests) were made to Res.cloudinary.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (573 ms) belongs to the original domain Sleep.how.
Page size can be reduced by 47.4 kB (13%)
375.2 kB
327.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Sleep.how main page is 375.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 193.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sleep images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sleep.how has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (33%)
18
12
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sleep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sleep.how
135 ms
sleep.how
265 ms
jquery.min.js
23 ms
home.css
227 ms
lazysizes.min.js
22 ms
autoptimize_d7dd8580014dacfe71eefce0b30cee3f.js
307 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
57 ms
sleep_experts-scaled_yo35bg.jpg
206 ms
saatva-logo.png
145 ms
Helix-Sleep-Logo-sm.png
110 ms
LoomandLeaf.png
160 ms
bear-mattress-logo.png
146 ms
Nolah-logo.png
95 ms
layla-logo.png
196 ms
Purple-Mattress-Logo.png
215 ms
Puffy-Mattress-Logo.png
254 ms
Avocado-logo.png
358 ms
autoptimize_88f8770b228ca7edfc8e786da90a7938.css
289 ms
autoptimize_single_30a820de3fd84817be8a7b36457602e3.css
14 ms
autoptimize_single_ced0eaffb42b05dd2478199cf025754f.css
251 ms
xXNJVVHOV949t+t7a+h8qJiExAAA=
1 ms
titillium-web-normal-700.woff
235 ms
titillium-web-normal-900.woff
270 ms
titillium-web-normal-600.woff
227 ms
titillium-web-normal-400.woff
261 ms
titillium-web-normal-300.woff
269 ms
titillium-web-normal-200.woff
261 ms
roboto-normal-400.woff
466 ms
roboto-normal-500.woff
491 ms
roboto-normal-300.woff
500 ms
roboto-normal-100.woff
545 ms
roboto-normal-700.woff
516 ms
roboto-normal-900.woff
573 ms
sleep.how accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
sleep.how best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sleep.how SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sleep.how can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sleep.how main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sleep.how
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sleep. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: