2.3 sec in total
284 ms
1.7 sec
287 ms
Visit slicebox.net now to see the best up-to-date Slicebox content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about slicebox.net
Copyright© 2018-2026 All Rights Reserved ⎝⎛申博太阳城⎞⎠ 版权所有 信誉首选,大额无忧!
Visit slicebox.netWe analyzed Slicebox.net page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
slicebox.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.219
57/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
284 ms
209 ms
280 ms
46 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Slicebox.net, 18% (6 requests) were made to Demoimages.novarostudio.com and 15% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Demoimages.novarostudio.com.
Page size can be reduced by 112.9 kB (24%)
480.0 kB
367.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Slicebox.net main page is 480.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 339.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Slicebox images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 86.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (46%)
28
15
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slicebox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
slicebox.net
284 ms
209 ms
280 ms
css
46 ms
comment-reply.min.js
138 ms
jquery.form.min.js
206 ms
scripts.js
137 ms
jquery.easing.js
139 ms
jquery.color.js
290 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
343 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
409 ms
superfish.js
291 ms
supersubs.js
346 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
417 ms
tinynav.min.js
406 ms
retina.min.js
413 ms
custom.js
478 ms
icon4.png
973 ms
bg-header.jpg
358 ms
timeline.gif
288 ms
hostingprice.png
291 ms
hpc.jpg
362 ms
2.jpg
571 ms
4.jpg
631 ms
icon5.png
1032 ms
home1.png
1182 ms
icon2.png
1127 ms
icon3.png
1128 ms
icon6.png
1127 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
33 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
51 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
64 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
65 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
64 ms
slicebox.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
slicebox.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
slicebox.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slicebox.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Slicebox.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
slicebox.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slicebox. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: