Tools & Wizards About Us
slicejob.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

slicejob.com

Search & Find Job Vacancies in Nepal :: Slicejob

Page Load Speed

7.6 sec in total

First Response

513 ms

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

471 ms

slicejob.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to slicejob.com homepage info - get ready to check Slicejob best content for Nepal right away, or after learning these important things about slicejob.com

Search and Find the job vacancies in Nepal from highest paying companies at Slicejob. Visit our website and apply online now.

Visit slicejob.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Slicejob.com page load time and found that the first response time was 513 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

slicejob.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

slicejob.com

513 ms

slicejob.com

2266 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1169 ms

default.min.css

945 ms

main.min.css

947 ms

Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Slicejob.com, 20% (20 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Slicejob.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 437.2 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Slicejob.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 120.6 kB

  • Original 137.8 kB
  • After minification 88.4 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 49.4 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 306.9 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Slicejob needs image optimization as it can save up to 306.9 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 175.3 kB
  • After minification 175.2 kB
  • After compression 169.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 48.2 kB
  • After minification 48.2 kB
  • After compression 44.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slicejob.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (48%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

48

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slicejob. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

slicejob.com

slicejob.com

513 ms

slicejob.com

slicejob.com

2266 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1169 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

945 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

947 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

952 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

968 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

37 ms

recent_style.min.css

recent_style.min.css

985 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

1184 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

52 ms

main.js

main.js

1184 ms

bootstrap-combobox.js

bootstrap-combobox.js

1208 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.js

bootstrap-datepicker.js

1441 ms

css2

css2

40 ms

css2

css2

56 ms

css2

css2

63 ms

main-plus.min.css

main-plus.min.css

1227 ms

js

js

69 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

138 ms

css

css

17 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

135 ms

cse.js

cse.js

170 ms

f117e5a2130b16d4dac75a42e.js

f117e5a2130b16d4dac75a42e.js

170 ms

slice-job-new-logo-12.jpg

slice-job-new-logo-12.jpg

524 ms

242_company.jpg

242_company.jpg

746 ms

221_company.png

221_company.png

746 ms

232_company.png

232_company.png

522 ms

117_company.jpg

117_company.jpg

260 ms

238_company.png

238_company.png

763 ms

241_company.jpg

241_company.jpg

745 ms

111_company.jpg

111_company.jpg

747 ms

240_company.png

240_company.png

746 ms

239_company.png

239_company.png

967 ms

168_company.jpg

168_company.jpg

983 ms

228_company.png

228_company.png

983 ms

135_company.png

135_company.png

982 ms

237_company.png

237_company.png

983 ms

236_company.png

236_company.png

999 ms

201_company.png

201_company.png

1198 ms

226_company.png

226_company.png

1436 ms

230_company.png

230_company.png

1213 ms

235_company.png

235_company.png

1457 ms

133_company.png

133_company.png

1230 ms

215_company.png

215_company.png

1495 ms

222_company.png

222_company.png

1433 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1456 ms

218_company.png

218_company.png

1456 ms

205_company.png

205_company.png

1666 ms

216_company.png

216_company.png

1913 ms

192_company.png

192_company.png

1914 ms

214_company.png

214_company.png

1683 ms

200_company.png

200_company.png

1701 ms

213_company.png

213_company.png

1733 ms

212_company.jpeg

212_company.jpeg

1896 ms

42_company.jpg

42_company.jpg

1913 ms

202_company.png

202_company.png

2167 ms

227_company.png

227_company.png

1975 ms

67.png

67.png

2120 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

139 ms

slicejob-play-store-qr.png

slicejob-play-store-qr.png

2110 ms

5aUz9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt3V0.ttf

5aUz9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt3V0.ttf

154 ms

5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5f1LmE0.ttf

5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5f1LmE0.ttf

181 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

83 ms

page.php

page.php

288 ms

collect

collect

43 ms

cse_element__en.js

cse_element__en.js

62 ms

default+en.css

default+en.css

94 ms

default.css

default.css

96 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

28 ms

OpNCnoEEmtHa6FcJ.ttf

OpNCnoEEmtHa6FcJ.ttf

46 ms

Roboto-Regular.ttf

Roboto-Regular.ttf

2121 ms

eOzOzediAge.css

eOzOzediAge.css

177 ms

j_Ggo8CUTKP.css

j_Ggo8CUTKP.css

178 ms

3QfZMMCQJul.css

3QfZMMCQJul.css

179 ms

TLnTRG4Rs5A.js

TLnTRG4Rs5A.js

184 ms

pLoSlJD7y1F.js

pLoSlJD7y1F.js

184 ms

Mw5y7Z3v-mj.js

Mw5y7Z3v-mj.js

181 ms

o1ndYS2og_B.js

o1ndYS2og_B.js

183 ms

Glud--w-qOK.js

Glud--w-qOK.js

209 ms

IUvgVkA30DJ.js

IUvgVkA30DJ.js

211 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

209 ms

ALTQi95mOyD.js

ALTQi95mOyD.js

228 ms

OCDsdHObU5V.js

OCDsdHObU5V.js

232 ms

r5HcOUY3OX6.js

r5HcOUY3OX6.js

239 ms

DtR0X5vxkLl.js

DtR0X5vxkLl.js

242 ms

8IAOdJiZGNE.js

8IAOdJiZGNE.js

211 ms

daRG11v-d-4.js

daRG11v-d-4.js

229 ms

HzxD9aAXSyD.js

HzxD9aAXSyD.js

256 ms

151 ms

play-store-logo.png

play-store-logo.png

1635 ms

slicejob-app-store-qr.png

slicejob-app-store-qr.png

1695 ms

290741198_2020896404760978_8618215707892508476_n.png

290741198_2020896404760978_8618215707892508476_n.png

151 ms

272962500_1917187718465181_903541598948861454_n.jpg

272962500_1917187718465181_903541598948861454_n.jpg

116 ms

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

54 ms

ACyU6_uYiU6.js

ACyU6_uYiU6.js

39 ms

F3tBKTAgRNo.js

F3tBKTAgRNo.js

39 ms

app-store-logo.png

app-store-logo.png

1611 ms

slicejob-mobile-1.png

slicejob-mobile-1.png

1636 ms

slicejob-front-banner.png

slicejob-front-banner.png

1673 ms

Accessibility Review

slicejob.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

slicejob.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

slicejob.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slicejob.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slicejob.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

slicejob.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Slicejob. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: