1.4 sec in total
78 ms
1.1 sec
235 ms
Welcome to sligh.com homepage info - get ready to check Sligh best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about sligh.com
Sligh’s beautiful and innovative designs offer an unparalleled blend of form and function, with styles ranging from traditional to contemporary.
Visit sligh.comWe analyzed Sligh.com page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
sligh.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value29.0 s
0/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value540 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.21
59/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
78 ms
120 ms
124 ms
44 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sligh.com, 59% (37 requests) were made to Lexington.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (465 ms) relates to the external source Lexington.com.
Page size can be reduced by 387.0 kB (13%)
2.9 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Sligh.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68 B or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 165.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sligh images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 110.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 110.1 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 111.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sligh.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 111.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (54%)
57
26
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sligh. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sligh.com
78 ms
sligh.cfm
120 ms
sligh
124 ms
master.css
44 ms
css
32 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
platform.js
66 ms
flexslider.css
84 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
97 ms
element.js
74 ms
venobox.js
97 ms
venobox.css
97 ms
picturefill.js
97 ms
custom.js
97 ms
modernizr-touch.js
121 ms
reset.css
96 ms
global.css
97 ms
screen.css
140 ms
mega_menu.css
100 ms
colorbox.css
102 ms
typography.css
126 ms
sdk.js
94 ms
main-logo.png
58 ms
sligh-logo.png
58 ms
LaredoDesk.jpg
362 ms
IsleOfPalmsDeck.jpg
359 ms
OceanClubMediaConsole.jpg
360 ms
AmesburyExecutiveDesk.jpg
327 ms
PacificIsleMediaConsole.jpg
409 ms
Studio_Designs.jpg
290 ms
307HW_410_RS_Vertical.jpg
357 ms
Prestonwood.jpg
359 ms
Bal_Harbor.jpg
423 ms
Barton_Creek.jpg
445 ms
Longboat_Key.jpg
422 ms
Breckenridge.jpg
421 ms
Laredo.jpg
421 ms
icon-youtube-gold.png
464 ms
icon-houzz-gold.png
465 ms
3506.js
134 ms
translateelement.css
73 ms
main.js
181 ms
efd6FGWWGX5Z3ztwLBrG9VBI1aZvkJLeFEwcwXkBYq0.ttf
33 ms
tXSgPxDl7Lk8Zr_5qX8FIfqJSHIsY8pKqTgTouATXAk.ttf
34 ms
icomoon.woff
409 ms
260 ms
xd_arbiter.php
34 ms
xd_arbiter.php
125 ms
ga.js
44 ms
gtm.js
133 ms
s
131 ms
t.js
58 ms
preload-circle.png
177 ms
next.gif
179 ms
prev.gif
207 ms
u
116 ms
element_main.js
66 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
collect
78 ms
translate_24dp.png
42 ms
l
58 ms
cleardot.gif
47 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
23 ms
sligh.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
sligh.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
sligh.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sligh.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sligh.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
sligh.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sligh. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: