Tools & Wizards About Us
slijterij.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

slijterij.net

Slijterij.net: hét overzicht van alle Nederlandse slijterijen

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

562 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

317 ms

slijterij.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to slijterij.net homepage info - get ready to check Slijterij best content right away, or after learning these important things about slijterij.net

Op deze website vindt u een helder overzicht van alle slijterijen in Nederland. Heeft u zelf een slijterij of mist u er een? Voeg hem dan geheel gratis toe!

Visit slijterij.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Slijterij.net page load time and found that the first response time was 562 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

slijterij.net performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

slijterij.net

562 ms

foundation.css

608 ms

style.css

197 ms

main.css

186 ms

modernizr.js

197 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Slijterij.net, 12% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (608 ms) belongs to the original domain Slijterij.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 404.5 kB (58%)

Content Size

698.8 kB

After Optimization

294.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Slijterij.net main page is 698.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 248.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 27.6 kB
  • After minification 21.9 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 43.9 kB

  • Original 248.5 kB
  • After minification 204.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Slijterij needs image optimization as it can save up to 43.9 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 134.4 kB

  • Original 193.6 kB
  • After minification 193.6 kB
  • After compression 59.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 201.9 kB

  • Original 229.1 kB
  • After minification 185.5 kB
  • After compression 27.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slijterij.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (54%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slijterij. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

slijterij.net

slijterij.net

562 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

608 ms

style.css

style.css

197 ms

main.css

main.css

186 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

197 ms

css

css

26 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

257 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

349 ms

hamburger.js

hamburger.js

196 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

474 ms

hamburger.png

hamburger.png

191 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

534 ms

logo-gall-en-gall.jpg

logo-gall-en-gall.jpg

218 ms

logo-mitra.jpg

logo-mitra.jpg

282 ms

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

23 ms

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf

23 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

278 ms

Accessibility Review

slijterij.net accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

slijterij.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

slijterij.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slijterij.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slijterij.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

slijterij.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slijterij. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: