Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

slimkeeper.com

SlimKeeper 纖司令系列商品|抗性澱粉的專家|天然健康好食品

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

179 ms

slimkeeper.com screenshot

About Website

Visit slimkeeper.com now to see the best up-to-date Slim Keeper content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about slimkeeper.com

『網友狂推!高纖低脂』,飲食健康從每一口開始 這款有醫學期刊研究成果的麵條,適合有三高或在健身的家人朋友們 ★ PPB-R-203 配方澱粉製造 ★膳食纖維含量每100公克達8.57~12.2% ★國際專業期刊刊登研究成果 ★成品通過380種農藥殘留、重金屬、塑化劑和順丁烯二酸等檢驗

Visit slimkeeper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Slimkeeper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

slimkeeper.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.172

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

slimkeeper.com

1565 ms

jquery.min.js

2276 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

2080 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

1875 ms

dgFactor.js

1677 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Slimkeeper.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Slimkeeper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.1 kB (25%)

Content Size

565.8 kB

After Optimization

426.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Slimkeeper.com main page is 565.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 365.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 9.6 kB
  • After minification 9.1 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 365.5 kB
  • After minification 349.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Slim Keeper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 103.8 kB

  • Original 174.8 kB
  • After minification 174.3 kB
  • After compression 71.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 103.8 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 12.7 kB

  • Original 15.9 kB
  • After minification 12.1 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slimkeeper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (20%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slim Keeper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

slimkeeper.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

slimkeeper.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

slimkeeper.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    TW

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slimkeeper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Twi language. Our system also found out that Slimkeeper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slim Keeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: