9.7 sec in total
1.8 sec
7.3 sec
562 ms
Visit slimreport.com now to see the best up-to-date Slimreport content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about slimreport.com
Visit slimreport.comWe analyzed Slimreport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
slimreport.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value330 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.095
91/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
1812 ms
542 ms
22 ms
806 ms
1360 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Slimreport.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Slimreport.com.
Page size can be reduced by 702.4 kB (42%)
1.7 MB
952.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Slimreport.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 775.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Slimreport images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 299.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 299.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 299.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slimreport.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 299.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (42%)
67
39
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slimreport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.slimreport.com
1812 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
542 ms
css
22 ms
genericons.css
806 ms
style.css
1360 ms
jquery.js
1382 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
561 ms
jquery.cookie.js
561 ms
standard-widget-extensions.min.js
819 ms
offer-date.js
583 ms
year.js
582 ms
imagerollover.js
814 ms
functions.js
836 ms
bg.jpg
339 ms
help-desk.gif
297 ms
flag.png
337 ms
shopcart.png
301 ms
header.png
1685 ms
logo.png
337 ms
mental-agility.jpg
538 ms
lady-bg.png
1087 ms
left-quote.png
554 ms
right-qoute.png
556 ms
doctor.png
1406 ms
Contains.jpg
1078 ms
ebook.png
1105 ms
order-now.jpg
832 ms
try-risk.png
1390 ms
select-your-order.png
1346 ms
preferred-pack.gif
1360 ms
extreme-value.gif
1381 ms
most-popular.gif
1615 ms
the-starter.gif
1632 ms
free-standard-shipping.jpg
1657 ms
graphic-coupons.png
1668 ms
share-fb.gif
1683 ms
share-twitter.gif
1882 ms
order-lft.png
1909 ms
fancy_closebox.png
1933 ms
player_api
109 ms
arrow.png
1923 ms
banofer-bg.png
1945 ms
sidebar-bg.png
2188 ms
free-coupon-2.png
2094 ms
proximanova-reg-webfont.woff
2126 ms
Oswald-regular.woff
2152 ms
Oswald-light.woff
2169 ms
Oswald-bold.woff
2195 ms
preferred-pack-2.gif
2353 ms
extreme-value-2.gif
2386 ms
2e777797-9984-407c-b327-3dd77bc7a8f1.js
276 ms
ga.js
51 ms
gtm.js
53 ms
seal_1189451.js
52 ms
coupon_code1.js
49 ms
test
433 ms
account_version_check.html
45 ms
www-widgetapi.js
36 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
conversion_async.js
17 ms
uNBmIxfsp3w
62 ms
coupon_code2.js
11 ms
35 ms
93 ms
account_config.html
35 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
4 ms
www-embed-player.js
38 ms
piwik.js
2200 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
22 ms
ad_status.js
84 ms
most-popular-2.gif
2176 ms
the-starter-2.gif
2195 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
82 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
82 ms
blank.gif
19 ms
s.gif
31 ms
slimreport.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
slimreport.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
slimreport.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slimreport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Slimreport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
slimreport.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slimreport. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: