Tools & Wizards About Us
slite.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

slite.us

Slite Electrical Supply丨Commercial Lighting Solution - Slite Lighting Products

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

101 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

179 ms

slite.us screenshot

About Website

Visit slite.us now to see the best up-to-date Slite content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about slite.us

Slite Electrical Supply designs and manufactures LED lighting,Smart lighting, USB charger 3.0 and Audio cable tester under the brand name of Silverlite and Keilton

Visit slite.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Slite.us page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

slite.us performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.6 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.777

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

slite.us

101 ms

ajaxlogin.css

12 ms

prototype.js

17 ms

jquery-1.12.1.min.js

41 ms

noconflict.js

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Slite.us, 12% (7 requests) were made to Silverlitelightsource.s3.amazonaws.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (688 ms) relates to the external source At.alicdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.6 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Slite.us main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 21.9 kB

  • Original 27.2 kB
  • After minification 22.6 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 229 B

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Slite images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 79.1 kB

  • Original 342.1 kB
  • After minification 340.7 kB
  • After compression 263.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.1 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 60.6 kB
  • After minification 60.6 kB
  • After compression 48.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slite.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (75%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

slite.us

slite.us

101 ms

ajaxlogin.css

ajaxlogin.css

12 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

17 ms

jquery-1.12.1.min.js

jquery-1.12.1.min.js

41 ms

noconflict.js

noconflict.js

40 ms

ccard.js

ccard.js

39 ms

validation.js

validation.js

39 ms

builder.js

builder.js

39 ms

effects.js

effects.js

39 ms

dragdrop.js

dragdrop.js

64 ms

controls.js

controls.js

65 ms

slider.js

slider.js

67 ms

js.js

js.js

66 ms

form.js

form.js

66 ms

translate.js

translate.js

66 ms

cookies.js

cookies.js

74 ms

modernizr.custom.min.js

modernizr.custom.min.js

74 ms

selectivizr.js

selectivizr.js

76 ms

matchMedia.js

matchMedia.js

74 ms

matchMedia.addListener.js

matchMedia.addListener.js

75 ms

enquire.js

enquire.js

75 ms

app.js

app.js

79 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

81 ms

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

77 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

77 ms

imagesloaded.js

imagesloaded.js

76 ms

minicart.js

minicart.js

79 ms

jquery.customSelect.js

jquery.customSelect.js

79 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

86 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

85 ms

main.js

main.js

91 ms

jquery-ui-1-10-4.js

jquery-ui-1-10-4.js

100 ms

ajaxlogin.js

ajaxlogin.js

91 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

85 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

91 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

92 ms

js

js

160 ms

font_2004324_z1s0qnfrn8.css

font_2004324_z1s0qnfrn8.css

161 ms

main.css

main.css

129 ms

ga.js

ga.js

212 ms

slite_-banner1.jpg

slite_-banner1.jpg

309 ms

slite-banner2.jpg

slite-banner2.jpg

308 ms

slite-banner3.jpg

slite-banner3.jpg

311 ms

slite-banner4.jpg

slite-banner4.jpg

336 ms

slite-menu1.jpg

slite-menu1.jpg

306 ms

slite-menu2.jpg

slite-menu2.jpg

318 ms

slite-menu3.jpg

slite-menu3.jpg

334 ms

slite-logo_v4.png

slite-logo_v4.png

183 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

77 ms

ROBOTOCONDENSED-REGULAR.TTF

ROBOTOCONDENSED-REGULAR.TTF

56 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

52 ms

font_2004324_z1s0qnfrn8.woff

font_2004324_z1s0qnfrn8.woff

688 ms

js

js

70 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

48 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

25 ms

collect

collect

71 ms

collect

collect

49 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

39 ms

Accessibility Review

slite.us accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

slite.us best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

slite.us SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slite.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slite.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

slite.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slite. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: