Tools & Wizards About Us
slittingrewinding.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

slittingrewinding.com

Slitter Rewinder Machine Manufacturer | Slitting Rewinding

Page Load Speed

42.8 sec in total

First Response

13.9 sec

Resources Loaded

28.7 sec

Page Rendered

171 ms

slittingrewinding.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Slitting Rewinding content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about slittingrewinding.com

Slitter Rewinder Machine Manufacturer, High-Performance Slitting Machine, Roll Slitter for Fabric, Paper, Film, Jumbo Slitting Rewinding Machine

Visit slittingrewinding.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Slittingrewinding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13.9 sec and then it took 28.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

slittingrewinding.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value43.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.219

57/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.slittingrewinding.com

13911 ms

analytics.js

54 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

70 ms

style.min.css

130 ms

styles.css

128 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Slittingrewinding.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (13.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Slittingrewinding.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 160.9 kB (19%)

Content Size

858.2 kB

After Optimization

697.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Slittingrewinding.com main page is 858.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 446.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 50.4 kB

  • Original 61.6 kB
  • After minification 59.8 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 83 B

  • Original 261.3 kB
  • After minification 261.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Slitting Rewinding images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 70.5 kB

  • Original 446.3 kB
  • After minification 446.3 kB
  • After compression 375.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 40.0 kB

  • Original 89.0 kB
  • After minification 82.1 kB
  • After compression 48.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slittingrewinding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.0 kB or 45% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (75%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slitting Rewinding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.slittingrewinding.com

www.slittingrewinding.com

13911 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

54 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

70 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

130 ms

styles.css

styles.css

128 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

32 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

126 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

127 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

128 ms

animate.css

animate.css

131 ms

tx-style.css

tx-style.css

188 ms

css

css

33 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

217 ms

jquery.sidr.dark.css

jquery.sidr.dark.css

187 ms

itrans-slider.css

itrans-slider.css

189 ms

style.css

style.css

191 ms

blue.css

blue.css

190 ms

extra-style.css

extra-style.css

247 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

310 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

249 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

397 ms

index.js

index.js

252 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

275 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

308 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

308 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

397 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

397 ms

jquery.inview.min.js

jquery.inview.min.js

397 ms

tx-script.js

tx-script.js

398 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

398 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

397 ms

jquery.sidr.min.js

jquery.sidr.min.js

399 ms

functions.js

functions.js

400 ms

api.js

api.js

49 ms

index.js

index.js

448 ms

smush-lazy-load-native.min.js

smush-lazy-load-native.min.js

448 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

448 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

57 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

29 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

29 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

30 ms

4WwAY0AS7AIUFixAQGOWbFGBitYIbAQWUuwFFJYIbCAWR2wBitcWFmwFCsAAAABUcgLTgAA

4WwAY0AS7AIUFixAQGOWbFGBitYIbAQWUuwFFJYIbCAWR2wBitcWFmwFCsAAAABUcgLTgAA

2 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

30 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

30 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

29 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

72 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

72 ms

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

80 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

87 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

86 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

26 ms

logso.png

logso.png

1460 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

88 ms

p9-300x240.jpg

p9-300x240.jpg

1415 ms

p8-300x240.jpg

p8-300x240.jpg

2404 ms

p7-300x240.jpg

p7-300x240.jpg

2408 ms

p6-300x240.jpg

p6-300x240.jpg

2347 ms

p1-300x240.jpg

p1-300x240.jpg

3358 ms

p5-300x240.jpg

p5-300x240.jpg

1412 ms

p4-300x240.jpg

p4-300x240.jpg

1492 ms

p3-300x240.jpg

p3-300x240.jpg

1477 ms

s1.jpg

s1.jpg

186 ms

Accessibility Review

slittingrewinding.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

slittingrewinding.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

slittingrewinding.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slittingrewinding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slittingrewinding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

slittingrewinding.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slitting Rewinding. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: