35.6 sec in total
9.3 sec
24.7 sec
1.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Slitting Rewinding content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about slittingrewinding.com
Slitter Rewinder Machine Manufacturer, High-Performance Slitting Machine, Roll Slitter for Fabric, Paper, Film, Jumbo Slitting Rewinding Machine
Visit slittingrewinding.comWe analyzed Slittingrewinding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9.3 sec and then it took 26.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
slittingrewinding.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value32.8 s
0/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.219
57/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
9301 ms
447 ms
500 ms
556 ms
867 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Slittingrewinding.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Slittingrewinding.com.
Page size can be reduced by 133.1 kB (45%)
296.9 kB
163.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Slittingrewinding.com main page is 296.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 130.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Slitting Rewinding images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 81.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slittingrewinding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 81.7 kB or 63% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (89%)
45
5
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slitting Rewinding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.slittingrewinding.com
9301 ms
analytics.js
447 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
500 ms
style.min.css
556 ms
styles.css
867 ms
font-awesome.min.css
484 ms
owl.carousel.css
1612 ms
owl.transitions.css
476 ms
colorbox.css
696 ms
animate.css
507 ms
tx-style.css
536 ms
css
449 ms
genericons.css
563 ms
jquery.sidr.dark.css
603 ms
itrans-slider.css
604 ms
style.css
653 ms
blue.css
694 ms
extra-style.css
693 ms
jquery.min.js
696 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
695 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
757 ms
index.js
691 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
688 ms
masonry.min.js
689 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
735 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
735 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
758 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
770 ms
tx-script.js
790 ms
modernizr.custom.js
791 ms
waypoints.min.js
827 ms
jquery.sidr.min.js
830 ms
functions.js
826 ms
api.js
422 ms
index.js
845 ms
smush-lazy-load-native.min.js
846 ms
wp-embed.min.js
879 ms
collect
71 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf
13 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf
12 ms
4WwAY0AS7AIUFixAQGOWbFGBitYIbAQWUuwFFJYIbCAWR2wBitcWFmwFCsAAAABUcgLTgAA
9 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
236 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
231 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
231 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
180 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
135 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
134 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
327 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
121 ms
recaptcha__en.js
165 ms
logso.png
293 ms
overlay.png
621 ms
slittingrewinding.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
slittingrewinding.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
slittingrewinding.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slittingrewinding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slittingrewinding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
slittingrewinding.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slitting Rewinding. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: