4.1 sec in total
616 ms
3 sec
491 ms
Visit sltc.sa now to see the best up-to-date Sltc content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sltc.sa
Law Center
Visit sltc.saWe analyzed Sltc.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 616 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
sltc.sa performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.1 s
0/100
10%
Value17.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value630 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.173
69/100
15%
Value17.0 s
5/100
10%
616 ms
236 ms
53 ms
100 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Sltc.sa, 25% (24 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 10% (10 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (616 ms) belongs to the original domain Sltc.sa.
Page size can be reduced by 682.4 kB (26%)
2.7 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Sltc.sa main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sltc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 394.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 394.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sltc.sa needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 122.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (28%)
89
64
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sltc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sltc.sa
616 ms
colorbox.css
236 ms
droidarabickufi.css
53 ms
bootstrap.min.css
100 ms
style.css
70 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
59 ms
owl.carousel.css
62 ms
jquery.js
50 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
257 ms
bootstrap.min.js
93 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
94 ms
jquery.touchwipe.js
88 ms
js
87 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
283 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
113 ms
responsiveslides.js
114 ms
my_js.js
113 ms
validation.js
132 ms
body.jpg
75 ms
i-ser.png
71 ms
soc.png
73 ms
logo1.png
71 ms
logo2.png
69 ms
shadow.png
73 ms
a828db78b70ac4039e031920386b8215.jpg
131 ms
38082b7a7a4360416f6bb8f256113bda.jpg
76 ms
e756aae03d2fcfd1705ef40c04cf30f1.jpg
132 ms
118f881fa8fb110b1a587adf11adcfe6.jpg
72 ms
988c9a9c6500727dfbf00b5c697170d6.jpg
130 ms
b0859cb60fc337f0c57d30aadc2ff70f.jpg
130 ms
3127738eba126d2d948d33734547202e.JPG
134 ms
26ff32f3111e45f914cfde30cbb0ba04.jpg
131 ms
icons.png
132 ms
sa.png
187 ms
book.png
132 ms
ae.png
185 ms
next.png
183 ms
prev.png
183 ms
14ee47090bc12d27a79b026548905b1a.png
214 ms
c1606977a957186bd45d0238c8202b84.jpg
185 ms
2d9f3f9d03647d78c451bbfd19baf564.png
186 ms
14dd5d9b117c7f12960b74593b82c091.png
185 ms
5418722386d81668c9c1535685b34743.png
185 ms
91b089e882bfe7ad2ecf1221fc56ef04.png
186 ms
7ebae9e0c53a849bd488ffe875d6c81d.png
186 ms
more.png
187 ms
i-info.png
188 ms
footer-logo.png
188 ms
DroidKufi-Regular.woff
56 ms
DroidKufi-Bold.woff
55 ms
i-2.png
73 ms
i-1.png
73 ms
i-5.png
78 ms
i-7.png
79 ms
i-6.png
79 ms
i-4.png
91 ms
i-3.png
92 ms
i-8.png
96 ms
common.js
23 ms
map.js
45 ms
util.js
100 ms
marker.js
98 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
249 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
253 ms
onion.js
40 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
75 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
51 ms
stats.js
49 ms
controls.js
45 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
45 ms
transparent.png
71 ms
css
152 ms
google4.png
135 ms
mapcnt6.png
79 ms
sv5.png
85 ms
spotlight-poi.png
83 ms
vt
145 ms
vt
147 ms
vt
141 ms
vt
140 ms
vt
82 ms
vt
138 ms
vt
139 ms
vt
211 ms
vt
183 ms
vt
185 ms
vt
201 ms
tmapctrl.png
61 ms
cb_scout5.png
62 ms
tmapctrl4.png
78 ms
imgs8.png
78 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
27 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
62 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
79 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
82 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
47 ms
sltc.sa accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
sltc.sa best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sltc.sa SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
AR
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sltc.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sltc.sa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sltc.sa
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sltc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: