Tools & Wizards About Us
smail.chat screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

smail.chat

Chat gratuit Smail.fr, le chat gratuit pour rencontre

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

218 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

353 ms

smail.chat screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Smail content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about smail.chat

Chat gratuit pour rencontrer des centaines de connectés en tout temps sur le Chat. Rencontre des célibataires en ligne et tchat gratuit.

Visit smail.chat

Key Findings

We analyzed Smail.chat page load time and found that the first response time was 218 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smail.chat performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,550 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

smail.chat

218 ms

chat

287 ms

chat

343 ms

143 ms

core.min.css

173 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Smail.chat, 79% (19 requests) were made to Smail.fr and 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (650 ms) relates to the external source Smail.fr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.6 kB (17%)

Content Size

438.3 kB

After Optimization

364.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Smail.chat main page is 438.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 169.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 45.3 kB

  • Original 54.8 kB
  • After minification 45.7 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 169.4 kB
  • After minification 141.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Smail needs image optimization as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 179 B

  • Original 150.2 kB
  • After minification 150.2 kB
  • After compression 150.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 126 B

  • Original 63.8 kB
  • After minification 63.8 kB
  • After compression 63.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smail.chat has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (31%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

smail.chat

smail.chat

218 ms

chat

chat

287 ms

chat

chat

343 ms

143 ms

core.min.css

core.min.css

173 ms

cards.min.css

cards.min.css

229 ms

69fe008.css

69fe008.css

233 ms

logo.png

logo.png

352 ms

2a27dde.png

2a27dde.png

650 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

20 ms

router.js

router.js

351 ms

routing

routing

352 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

501 ms

homepage.dependencies.min.js

homepage.dependencies.min.js

361 ms

background.home.v5.webp

background.home.v5.webp

380 ms

default.jpg

default.jpg

95 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

94 ms

default.1x1.png

default.1x1.png

162 ms

default.jpg

default.jpg

164 ms

logo.light.png

logo.light.png

162 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

94 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

95 ms

icons.woff

icons.woff

267 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

121 ms

Accessibility Review

smail.chat accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

smail.chat best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

smail.chat SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smail.chat can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smail.chat main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

smail.chat

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Smail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: