Tools & Wizards About Us
smartjanitorial.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

smartjanitorial.com

Home - Smart Janitorial Office Cleaning Systems, Orange, California

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

65 ms

smartjanitorial.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to smartjanitorial.com homepage info - get ready to check Smart Janitorial best content right away, or after learning these important things about smartjanitorial.com

Smart Janitorial Office Cleaning Systems, Janitorial Services, Porter Service, Commercial Building Maintenance, Facility Maintenance Services, Office Cleaning, Commercial Building Cleaning, Office Bui...

Visit smartjanitorial.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Smartjanitorial.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smartjanitorial.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,600 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.smartjanitorial.com

165 ms

minified.js

54 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

51 ms

polyfill.min.js

892 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1df9637b.bundle.min.js

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Smartjanitorial.com, 40% (20 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 28% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (965 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (59%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

752.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Smartjanitorial.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 928.5 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 237.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 928.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 89.9 kB

  • Original 331.5 kB
  • After minification 241.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Smart Janitorial needs image optimization as it can save up to 89.9 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 321.3 kB
  • After minification 321.3 kB
  • After compression 273.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (33%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smart Janitorial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.smartjanitorial.com

www.smartjanitorial.com

165 ms

minified.js

minified.js

54 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

51 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

892 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1df9637b.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.1df9637b.bundle.min.js

70 ms

main.4310c786.bundle.min.js

main.4310c786.bundle.min.js

75 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

69 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

72 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

72 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

74 ms

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

73 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

74 ms

bat.js

bat.js

169 ms

0e3d5d_8c6f5972fbaa4c04855f7d5c0cd7ec57_.png

0e3d5d_8c6f5972fbaa4c04855f7d5c0cd7ec57_.png

255 ms

eb3d0b_23cf0944a0154975b73e65ca902aeb1c~mv2.png

eb3d0b_23cf0944a0154975b73e65ca902aeb1c~mv2.png

449 ms

dc0fc5816c994f1ea563e14bbc77e6f6.jpg

dc0fc5816c994f1ea563e14bbc77e6f6.jpg

510 ms

f2efd12b0d1847248ac81a5e65c0d586.jpg

f2efd12b0d1847248ac81a5e65c0d586.jpg

366 ms

f7133f9895b24525a2ad16c1e778c9fa.jpg

f7133f9895b24525a2ad16c1e778c9fa.jpg

396 ms

902eec1d034d4126a621ebd062b29163.jpg

902eec1d034d4126a621ebd062b29163.jpg

371 ms

c375223a589b4efca8ff9d8b37e9efda.jpg

c375223a589b4efca8ff9d8b37e9efda.jpg

466 ms

eb3d0b_fb3dfed8e71906fe8f9d94a367b778ab.jpg

eb3d0b_fb3dfed8e71906fe8f9d94a367b778ab.jpg

619 ms

pic%201.webp

pic%201.webp

606 ms

1941cba06366487ca0f278d89206defb.jpg

1941cba06366487ca0f278d89206defb.jpg

615 ms

a2f4f061185f7f9e362c1a648d2c9d6c.jpg

a2f4f061185f7f9e362c1a648d2c9d6c.jpg

448 ms

Picture3.png

Picture3.png

585 ms

Picture2.png

Picture2.png

644 ms

Picture1.png

Picture1.png

965 ms

3b23e7970432450492e5d304d7a29374.jpg

3b23e7970432450492e5d304d7a29374.jpg

700 ms

1af70b5973771d67736218fc1f7b24c8.jpg

1af70b5973771d67736218fc1f7b24c8.jpg

748 ms

e36d9728e67e439798d6a0c50e57690b.jpg

e36d9728e67e439798d6a0c50e57690b.jpg

721 ms

d963f02d38f7403f80ed76cfb3c24c3f.jpg

d963f02d38f7403f80ed76cfb3c24c3f.jpg

809 ms

aee16976ce614b1fbb6b17d652d4584e.jpg

aee16976ce614b1fbb6b17d652d4584e.jpg

764 ms

3bf8a58c84dc48d6a4cc9c5a340703fa.jpg

3bf8a58c84dc48d6a4cc9c5a340703fa.jpg

794 ms

ironpatern.84ec58ff.png

ironpatern.84ec58ff.png

122 ms

bundle.tracing.es5.min.js

bundle.tracing.es5.min.js

44 ms

26074277.js

26074277.js

88 ms

99 ms

93 ms

84 ms

88 ms

77 ms

73 ms

69 ms

77 ms

86 ms

64 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

10 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

12 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

10 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

7 ms

Accessibility Review

smartjanitorial.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

smartjanitorial.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

smartjanitorial.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smartjanitorial.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smartjanitorial.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

smartjanitorial.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Smart Janitorial. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: