968 ms in total
16 ms
682 ms
270 ms
Visit smartrr.me now to see the best up-to-date Smartrr content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about smartrr.me
Looking for Best Digital Marketing & Growth Tools? Answer a few simple questions, and Smartrr will find you the best matching tools in minutes.
Visit smartrr.meWe analyzed Smartrr.me page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 952 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
smartrr.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
93/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value3,900 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.063
97/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
16 ms
45 ms
13 ms
52 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Smartrr.me, 9% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to S.adroll.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (259 ms) relates to the external source S.adroll.com.
Page size can be reduced by 312.4 kB (74%)
424.7 kB
112.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Smartrr.me main page is 424.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 368.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 312.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 312.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Smartrr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 370 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (51%)
37
18
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smartrr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
smartrr.me
16 ms
smartrr.me
45 ms
ab8f1fb1ddc23abf.css
13 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
52 ms
webpack-1e756f1c4ef6e89c.js
71 ms
framework-26e25db8f64defed.js
72 ms
main-2aa59b2d5bd96e1a.js
106 ms
_app-a79084e58eeeeaae.js
134 ms
61-def7ab31ad5387ff.js
69 ms
462-4156d9eb34053b18.js
106 ms
33-7ee1cae477d6348c.js
106 ms
488-d04934e33dd787b4.js
106 ms
index-e5b24598b08d3d95.js
106 ms
_buildManifest.js
133 ms
_ssgManifest.js
132 ms
image
138 ms
banner-img.8801bc21.svg
152 ms
Snovio-svg.bf328f50.svg
138 ms
Pipedrive-svg.8962f89e.svg
142 ms
miro-svg.dc0e7cd4.svg
143 ms
Mixmax-svg.8daa00a0.svg
144 ms
Teamwork-svg.f248cedb.svg
148 ms
Atlassian-svg.d1b1a053.svg
149 ms
arrow-right.7286903d.svg
165 ms
solution.cd0e2088.svg
173 ms
testimonialRight.77ce7b9c.svg
163 ms
testimonialIcon.0fc9bf5f.svg
172 ms
testimonialLeft.cb0c9576.svg
169 ms
gtm.js
60 ms
Nunito-Regular.f5e0ecdd.ttf
254 ms
Nunito-Medium.37241586.ttf
254 ms
Nunito-Light.0f64f5b3.ttf
257 ms
Nunito-ExtraLight.4787e8a4.ttf
257 ms
Nunito-Bold.24680196.ttf
255 ms
Nunito-ExtraBold.07193952.ttf
255 ms
js
53 ms
js
152 ms
roundtrip.js
38 ms
4WLCIAH3GJHMTHDD4HXZFI
58 ms
js
60 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
collect
15 ms
426NZUCC55HWRN4YK7XNW6.js
259 ms
collect
102 ms
ga-audiences
48 ms
smartrr.me accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
smartrr.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
smartrr.me SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smartrr.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smartrr.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
smartrr.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Smartrr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: