2.5 sec in total
241 ms
1.8 sec
461 ms
Welcome to smialcott.com homepage info - get ready to check Smialcott best content right away, or after learning these important things about smialcott.com
Transform how your brand engages people on their most important journeys.
Visit smialcott.comWe analyzed Smialcott.com page load time and found that the first response time was 241 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
smialcott.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value1,950 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.227
55/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
241 ms
218 ms
189 ms
29 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Smialcott.com, 72% (59 requests) were made to Brado.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (389 ms) relates to the external source Brado.net.
Page size can be reduced by 183.4 kB (28%)
657.3 kB
473.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Smialcott.com main page is 657.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 376.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 172.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 172.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Smialcott images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (70%)
69
21
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smialcott. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
smialcott.com
241 ms
smialcott.com
218 ms
brado.net
189 ms
main.min.css
29 ms
css
37 ms
custom-jet-blocks.css
54 ms
jet-elements.css
203 ms
jet-elements-skin.css
169 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
178 ms
swiper.min.css
217 ms
post-6.css
49 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
74 ms
global.css
79 ms
post-114.css
99 ms
post-119.css
139 ms
post-143.css
128 ms
script.min.js
150 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
162 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
180 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
190 ms
animations.min.css
190 ms
frontend.min.js
256 ms
jquery.min.js
255 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
311 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
310 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
312 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
311 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
312 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
313 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
330 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
329 ms
hooks.min.js
330 ms
i18n.min.js
330 ms
frontend.min.js
330 ms
waypoints.min.js
328 ms
core.min.js
376 ms
frontend.min.js
382 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
382 ms
jet-blocks.min.js
383 ms
jet-elements.min.js
378 ms
gtm.js
224 ms
White-Logo.svg
131 ms
learn_more.svg
137 ms
CardinalHealth-logo.svg
226 ms
BL-logo.svg
138 ms
Johnson_and_Johnson_Logo-1.svg
186 ms
BSMH-logo.svg
173 ms
Carecredit-logo2.svg
187 ms
Baxter.svg
188 ms
Kenvue-logo.svg
189 ms
Maryville_University.svg
184 ms
Merck-logo.svg
226 ms
WASHU2.svg
227 ms
elderly-lady-staring-out-a-window-3-scaled.jpg
231 ms
history-of-media.png
288 ms
Inter-Regular.ttf
221 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjg.woff
163 ms
Inter-Medium.ttf
221 ms
Inter-Light.ttf
222 ms
Inter-ExtraLight.ttf
263 ms
Inter-Thin.ttf
389 ms
Inter-SemiBold.ttf
315 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjg.woff
218 ms
Inter-Bold.ttf
323 ms
Inter-ExtraBold.ttf
321 ms
js
82 ms
js
139 ms
insight.min.js
201 ms
uwt.js
201 ms
5006694.js
200 ms
41czwmq65z
268 ms
pixel.js
266 ms
analytics.js
176 ms
insight.beta.min.js
20 ms
5006694.js
137 ms
banner.js
199 ms
collect
29 ms
clarity.js
19 ms
adsct
183 ms
adsct
113 ms
collect
40 ms
c.gif
7 ms
smialcott.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
smialcott.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
smialcott.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smialcott.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smialcott.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
smialcott.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Smialcott. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: