Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

smilegallery.com

General & Cosmetic Dentistry in Cupertino, CA | Dental Impants

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

152 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

665 ms

smilegallery.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Smilegallery content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about smilegallery.com

Cupertino Dental Facial Esthetics Clinic is the best general and family dentistry in Cupertino. We change your life with implants that fit great, look great.

Visit smilegallery.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Smilegallery.com page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smilegallery.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.9 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,020 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.127

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

smilegallery.com

152 ms

smilegallery.com

365 ms

yrw-widget.css

69 ms

style.min.css

139 ms

styles.css

211 ms

Our browser made a total of 182 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (161 requests) were addressed to the original Smilegallery.com, 4% (8 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.trustindex.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (820 ms) belongs to the original domain Smilegallery.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 641.2 kB (22%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Smilegallery.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 134.1 kB

  • Original 165.2 kB
  • After minification 162.1 kB
  • After compression 31.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 334.9 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Smilegallery needs image optimization as it can save up to 334.9 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 147.4 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 856.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 147.4 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 270.5 kB
  • After minification 269.3 kB
  • After compression 245.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smilegallery.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 137 (77%)

Requests Now

178

After Optimization

41

The browser has sent 178 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smilegallery. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 109 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

smilegallery.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

smilegallery.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

smilegallery.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smilegallery.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smilegallery.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Smilegallery. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: