Tools & Wizards About Us
smithpointfence.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

smithpointfence.com

Fence,gates and decks (sale and installation), Suffolk County - Smith Point Fence

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

142 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

552 ms

smithpointfence.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Smith Point Fence content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about smithpointfence.com

Fence,gates and decks (sale and installation), Aluminum fence (installation), Deck and stair rails (installation), Pergolas and Arbors (installation), Fence Repairs, Suffolk County

Visit smithpointfence.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Smithpointfence.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smithpointfence.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.162

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

smithpointfence.com

142 ms

www.smithpointfence.com

661 ms

ambiance.min.css

191 ms

styles.PAGE_26IMXXF2JE.min.css

341 ms

5a6a9b341953.png

628 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Smithpointfence.com, 50% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (661 ms) belongs to the original domain Smithpointfence.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 254.7 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Smithpointfence.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 66.4 kB

  • Original 81.2 kB
  • After minification 79.8 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 188.1 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Smith Point Fence needs image optimization as it can save up to 188.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 118 B

  • Original 94.8 kB
  • After minification 94.7 kB
  • After compression 94.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 40 B

  • Original 59.5 kB
  • After minification 59.5 kB
  • After compression 59.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smithpointfence.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (11%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smith Point Fence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

smithpointfence.com

smithpointfence.com

142 ms

www.smithpointfence.com

www.smithpointfence.com

661 ms

ambiance.min.css

ambiance.min.css

191 ms

styles.PAGE_26IMXXF2JE.min.css

styles.PAGE_26IMXXF2JE.min.css

341 ms

5a6a9b341953.png

5a6a9b341953.png

628 ms

ideo3.min.js

ideo3.min.js

627 ms

owl.option.header.js

owl.option.header.js

484 ms

template.min.js

template.min.js

526 ms

PAGE_26IMXXF2JE.min.js

PAGE_26IMXXF2JE.min.js

284 ms

c755b0803513.png

c755b0803513.png

476 ms

1f489f557aef.png

1f489f557aef.png

483 ms

979f23956adb.jpg

979f23956adb.jpg

483 ms

1f10fb103974.jpg

1f10fb103974.jpg

590 ms

f542067bf21f.jpg

f542067bf21f.jpg

590 ms

7241551788c0.jpg

7241551788c0.jpg

590 ms

pattern2.png

pattern2.png

554 ms

33251d2ae3e8.jpg

33251d2ae3e8.jpg

557 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

113 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

137 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

154 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

155 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

155 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

155 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

112 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

438 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

51 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

53 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

53 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

55 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

54 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

113 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

444 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

106 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

106 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

108 ms

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

106 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

108 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

109 ms

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDrMfJQ.ttf

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDrMfJQ.ttf

251 ms

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejMDrMfJQ.ttf

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejMDrMfJQ.ttf

441 ms

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjNDrMfJQ.ttf

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjNDrMfJQ.ttf

446 ms

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJQ.ttf

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJQ.ttf

251 ms

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMDrMfJQ.ttf

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMDrMfJQ.ttf

251 ms

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLDrMfJQ.ttf

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLDrMfJQ.ttf

440 ms

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDrMfJQ.ttf

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDrMfJQ.ttf

438 ms

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejLDrMfJQ.ttf

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejLDrMfJQ.ttf

446 ms

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4cHLDrMfJQ.ttf

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4cHLDrMfJQ.ttf

441 ms

awstats_misc_tracker.js

awstats_misc_tracker.js

210 ms

8363b9359c1f.jpg

8363b9359c1f.jpg

264 ms

91b1381ba737.jpg

91b1381ba737.jpg

174 ms

643e88d18259.jpg

643e88d18259.jpg

103 ms

548877267c6b.jpg

548877267c6b.jpg

103 ms

dfdd7ff12702.jpg

dfdd7ff12702.jpg

188 ms

50d1f1204307.jpg

50d1f1204307.jpg

102 ms

237522d276ae.jpg

237522d276ae.jpg

363 ms

980279af2352.jpg

980279af2352.jpg

195 ms

328f067111c4.jpg

328f067111c4.jpg

195 ms

f411bd4a721c.jpg

f411bd4a721c.jpg

267 ms

366075e2d4d8.jpg

366075e2d4d8.jpg

287 ms

b434a8a54403.jpg

b434a8a54403.jpg

288 ms

Accessibility Review

smithpointfence.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

smithpointfence.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

smithpointfence.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smithpointfence.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smithpointfence.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

smithpointfence.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Smith Point Fence. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: