Tools & Wizards About Us
smoothphotoscanning.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

smoothphotoscanning.com

Photo Scanning Services & Digitizing Services

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

225 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

264 ms

smoothphotoscanning.com screenshot

About Website

Visit smoothphotoscanning.com now to see the best up-to-date Smooth Photo Scanning content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about smoothphotoscanning.com

Smooth Photo Scanning provides professional photo scanning & digitizing services to preserve your memories. Contact us for affordable photo digitizing today.

Visit smoothphotoscanning.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Smoothphotoscanning.com page load time and found that the first response time was 225 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smoothphotoscanning.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.043

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

smoothphotoscanning.com

225 ms

smoothphotoscanning.com

588 ms

style.min.css

393 ms

style-index.css

307 ms

css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Smoothphotoscanning.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Smoothphotoscanning.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 90.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Smoothphotoscanning.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 77.6 kB

  • Original 99.0 kB
  • After minification 91.3 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Smooth Photo Scanning images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 252.5 kB
  • After minification 252.5 kB
  • After compression 250.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (73%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smooth Photo Scanning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

smoothphotoscanning.com

smoothphotoscanning.com

225 ms

smoothphotoscanning.com

smoothphotoscanning.com

588 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

393 ms

style-index.css

style-index.css

307 ms

css

css

38 ms

menu-image.css

menu-image.css

274 ms

sfsi-style.css

sfsi-style.css

397 ms

styles.css

styles.css

306 ms

styles.css

styles.css

865 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

592 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

579 ms

public-main.css

public-main.css

682 ms

style.css

style.css

681 ms

fresco.css

fresco.css

753 ms

modern.css

modern.css

856 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

994 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

974 ms

public-main.js

public-main.js

961 ms

fresco.js

fresco.js

1099 ms

style.css

style.css

1220 ms

faq.css

faq.css

1146 ms

animate.css

animate.css

1252 ms

auther.css

auther.css

1281 ms

fontawesome-all.css

fontawesome-all.css

1294 ms

icofont.css

icofont.css

1500 ms

js

js

50 ms

api.js

api.js

37 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1450 ms

main.js

main.js

1424 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

1461 ms

new.js

new.js

1482 ms

script.js

script.js

1506 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1697 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

92 ms

site_tracking.js

site_tracking.js

1698 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1721 ms

modernizr.custom.min.js

modernizr.custom.min.js

1751 ms

jquery.shuffle.min.js

jquery.shuffle.min.js

1763 ms

random-shuffle-min.js

random-shuffle-min.js

1783 ms

custom.js

custom.js

2017 ms

index.js

index.js

1996 ms

wp-slimstat.min.js

wp-slimstat.min.js

29 ms

index.js

index.js

1985 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

1829 ms

script.php

script.php

2291 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

62 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1027 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

215 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

171 ms

logo.png

logo.png

444 ms

phoneico.png

phoneico.png

445 ms

banner-1-_2_.webp

banner-1-_2_.webp

683 ms

digitalize-v3-2-_1_-min.webp

digitalize-v3-2-_1_-min.webp

630 ms

hmwork-img1.png

hmwork-img1.png

423 ms

hmwork-img2.png

hmwork-img2.png

713 ms

hmwork-img3.png

hmwork-img3.png

711 ms

hm-service-img1.png

hm-service-img1.png

732 ms

hm-service-img2.png

hm-service-img2.png

901 ms

hm-service-img3.png

hm-service-img3.png

965 ms

hm-service-img4.png

hm-service-img4.png

987 ms

hm-service-img5.png

hm-service-img5.png

987 ms

hm-service-img6.png

hm-service-img6.png

1004 ms

hm-service-img7.png

hm-service-img7.png

1159 ms

hm-service-img8.png

hm-service-img8.png

1180 ms

hm-service-img9.png

hm-service-img9.png

1236 ms

testiicon.png

testiicon.png

1280 ms

google.png

google.png

1281 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

1763 ms

03.jpg

03.jpg

1992 ms

font

font

209 ms

icofont.ttf

icofont.ttf

1887 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1635 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1576 ms

service-icobg.png

service-icobg.png

1530 ms

list.png

list.png

1823 ms

serialize.min.js

serialize.min.js

97 ms

counter.js

counter.js

148 ms

font

font

100 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1900 ms

t.php

t.php

124 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

24 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

9 ms

Accessibility Review

smoothphotoscanning.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

smoothphotoscanning.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

smoothphotoscanning.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smoothphotoscanning.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smoothphotoscanning.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

smoothphotoscanning.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Smooth Photo Scanning. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: