Tools & Wizards About Us
sms-sending.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

sms-sending.ru

CМС рассылка по базе клиентов: заказать SMS рассылку в Москве

Page Load Speed

10.2 sec in total

First Response

778 ms

Resources Loaded

9.1 sec

Page Rendered

292 ms

sms-sending.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SMS Sending content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sms-sending.ru

СМС рассылка от имени компании для оповещения клиентов ✔ Выгодные тарифы ✔ Удобный личный кабинет ✔ 50 бесплатных SMS сообщений в рассылке при регистрации.

Visit sms-sending.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Sms-sending.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 778 ms and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sms-sending.ru performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value680 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sms-sending.ru

778 ms

sms-sending.ru

1639 ms

style.css

296 ms

typo.css

592 ms

modal.css

842 ms

Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (104 requests) were addressed to the original Sms-sending.ru, 3% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Sms-sending.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 454.6 kB (29%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sms-sending.ru main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 55.2 kB

  • Original 70.0 kB
  • After minification 59.7 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.3 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 365.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 725.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SMS Sending needs image optimization as it can save up to 365.7 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 357.0 kB
  • After minification 356.7 kB
  • After compression 336.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 41.1 kB
  • After minification 41.1 kB
  • After compression 27.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sms-sending.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (41%)

Requests Now

114

After Optimization

67

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 114 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SMS Sending. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sms-sending.ru

sms-sending.ru

778 ms

sms-sending.ru

sms-sending.ru

1639 ms

style.css

style.css

296 ms

typo.css

typo.css

592 ms

modal.css

modal.css

842 ms

k2.css

k2.css

889 ms

system.css

system.css

898 ms

general.css

general.css

901 ms

btcontentslider.css

btcontentslider.css

913 ms

addons.css

addons.css

930 ms

layout.css

layout.css

1122 ms

template.css

template.css

1183 ms

usertools.css

usertools.css

1197 ms

css3.css

css3.css

1200 ms

mega.css

mega.css

1216 ms

typo.css

typo.css

1248 ms

template.css

template.css

1402 ms

mega.css

mega.css

1478 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

1798 ms

core.js

core.js

1500 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

2136 ms

script.js

script.js

1555 ms

modal.js

modal.js

1681 ms

jquery-1.8.2.min.js

jquery-1.8.2.min.js

2071 ms

k2.noconflict.js

k2.noconflict.js

1799 ms

k2.js

k2.js

1874 ms

caption.js

caption.js

1962 ms

core.js

core.js

2098 ms

mega.js

mega.js

2100 ms

slides.js

slides.js

2196 ms

default.js

default.js

2242 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

2366 ms

nevon-slider.css

nevon-slider.css

2397 ms

css

css

30 ms

nevon.slider.1.0.js

nevon.slider.1.0.js

2400 ms

slickr-flickr.js

slickr-flickr.js

2438 ms

jmpress.min.js

jmpress.min.js

2500 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

2521 ms

support.js

support.js

1029 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

2668 ms

jquery.default.1.0.js

jquery.default.1.0.js

2405 ms

modernizr.custom.48780.js

modernizr.custom.48780.js

2113 ms

calc.js

calc.js

1906 ms

otherscripts.js

otherscripts.js

1988 ms

system.css

system.css

1908 ms

jquery.form.js

jquery.form.js

2069 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

2089 ms

ga.js

ga.js

33 ms

tag.js

tag.js

855 ms

3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews

3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews

687 ms

bg_top.png

bg_top.png

1478 ms

br_foot.png

br_foot.png

919 ms

fb.png

fb.png

281 ms

ok.png

ok.png

323 ms

vk.png

vk.png

305 ms

key.png

key.png

301 ms

lock.png

lock.png

561 ms

logo.png

logo.png

601 ms

search.png

search.png

609 ms

searchButton.gif

searchButton.gif

645 ms

bonus_panel.png

bonus_panel.png

840 ms

menu.png

menu.png

917 ms

arrow_menu.png

arrow_menu.png

918 ms

kol.png

kol.png

960 ms

slide11.png

slide11.png

1688 ms

slide12.png

slide12.png

1795 ms

slide13.png

slide13.png

1501 ms

slide14.png

slide14.png

1826 ms

1.gif

1.gif

1280 ms

2.gif

2.gif

1595 ms

3.gif

3.gif

1772 ms

4.gif

4.gif

1801 ms

5.gif

5.gif

1918 ms

6.gif

6.gif

1961 ms

7.gif

7.gif

2067 ms

8.gif

8.gif

2095 ms

9.gif

9.gif

2100 ms

10.gif

10.gif

2130 ms

11.gif

11.gif

2232 ms

12.gif

12.gif

2240 ms

13.gif

13.gif

2363 ms

14.gif

14.gif

2393 ms

15.gif

15.gif

2401 ms

16.png

16.png

2434 ms

button.png

button.png

2537 ms

plus.png

plus.png

2501 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

8QIJdijAiM7o-qnZiI8Erw.ttf

8QIJdijAiM7o-qnZiI8Erw.ttf

97 ms

sms-sending.ru.json

sms-sending.ru.json

849 ms

calc2.png

calc2.png

2379 ms

displ1.png

displ1.png

2395 ms

calc-if.png

calc-if.png

2399 ms

button_fast.png

button_fast.png

2418 ms

otziv1.png

otziv1.png

2243 ms

fastreg.png

fastreg.png

2275 ms

bullet.gif

bullet.gif

2347 ms

1c.png

1c.png

2350 ms

https.png

https.png

2164 ms

smpp.png

smpp.png

2128 ms

api.png

api.png

2166 ms

legacy.support.js

legacy.support.js

757 ms

l-kab.png

l-kab.png

2266 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

683 ms

operator.png

operator.png

2291 ms

email2sms.png

email2sms.png

2014 ms

mobile.png

mobile.png

1828 ms

outlook.png

outlook.png

1848 ms

logo_foot.png

logo_foot.png

1769 ms

sync_cookie_image_decide

sync_cookie_image_decide

140 ms

outer.support.js

outer.support.js

501 ms

kol_foot.png

kol_foot.png

1820 ms

sitetebe_logo.png

sitetebe_logo.png

1773 ms

arrow_right.png

arrow_right.png

1798 ms

arrow_left.png

arrow_left.png

1804 ms

circle.png

circle.png

1826 ms

1

1

140 ms

circle_orange.png

circle_orange.png

1725 ms

Accessibility Review

sms-sending.ru accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sms-sending.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

sms-sending.ru SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sms-sending.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sms-sending.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sms-sending.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SMS Sending. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: