Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

smsforum.net

SMS Forum - Resources and Information (smsforum.net)

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

217 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

smsforum.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SMS Forum content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about smsforum.net

Resources on SMS including background, SMS testing, numbering, SMS text marketing, tools and other services

Visit smsforum.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Smsforum.net page load time and found that the first response time was 217 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

smsforum.net performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

79/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

smsforum.net

217 ms

smsforum.net

297 ms

bootstrap.min.css

71 ms

jquery-3.3.1.slim.min.js

120 ms

popper.min.js

190 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Smsforum.net, 29% (5 requests) were made to Melroselabs.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (875 ms) relates to the external source Melroselabs.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 300.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Smsforum.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 16.0 kB

  • Original 21.7 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 284.3 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SMS Forum needs image optimization as it can save up to 284.3 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SMS Forum. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

smsforum.net accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

smsforum.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

smsforum.net SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Smsforum.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Smsforum.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SMS Forum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: