1.5 sec in total
33 ms
388 ms
1.1 sec
Welcome to snack.to homepage info - get ready to check Snack best content right away, or after learning these important things about snack.to
100% Free GIFs to download to express your mood in your daily conversations! ✓Daily Updates ✓100% Free ✓ Most Hilarious
Visit snack.toWe analyzed Snack.to page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
snack.to performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value9.7 s
10/100
10%
Value2,300 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.313
37/100
15%
Value44.7 s
0/100
10%
33 ms
31 ms
11 ms
19 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Snack.to, 48% (16 requests) were made to Gifdb.com and 18% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (295 ms) relates to the external source Hb-targa.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 685.1 kB (68%)
1.0 MB
327.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Snack.to main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 381.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 215.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 45.0 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 215.7 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 683 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 152.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 152.2 kB or 44% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 316.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snack.to needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 316.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (75%)
24
6
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
snack.to
33 ms
gifdb.com
31 ms
style.min.css
11 ms
related-posts-block-styles.min.css
19 ms
amazonpolly-public.css
24 ms
bootstrap.min.css
50 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
49 ms
jquery-ui.css
41 ms
style.css
35 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
28 ms
amazonpolly-public.js
29 ms
lozad.min.js
28 ms
lozad-custom.js
33 ms
asc_prebid.js
295 ms
css2
68 ms
js
68 ms
jquery-ui.js
44 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
134 ms
scripts.js
36 ms
popper.min.js
30 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
35 ms
gtm.js
194 ms
gifdb.svg
126 ms
search-bg.jpg
222 ms
gifdb-sticky-mobile.png
63 ms
Logo.png
62 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff
96 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAA.woff
139 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAA.woff
161 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxM.woff
162 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff
161 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAA.woff
160 ms
PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA
4 ms
snack.to accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
snack.to best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
snack.to SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snack.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snack.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
snack.to
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Snack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: