831 ms in total
134 ms
519 ms
178 ms
Welcome to snafer.com homepage info - get ready to check Snafer best content right away, or after learning these important things about snafer.com
Visit snafer.comWe analyzed Snafer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 697 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
snafer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value4.1 s
78/100
10%
Value280 ms
81/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.5 s
58/100
10%
134 ms
149 ms
113 ms
28 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Snafer.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (149 ms) belongs to the original domain Snafer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 10.8 kB (74%)
14.5 kB
3.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Snafer.com main page is 14.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 9.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 887 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snafer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 887 B or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (18%)
28
23
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snafer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
snafer.com
134 ms
up
149 ms
113 ms
style.css
28 ms
tr-up_01.gif
35 ms
tr-up_02.gif
58 ms
tr-up_03.gif
40 ms
tr-up_04.gif
61 ms
tr-up_05.gif
41 ms
tr-up_06.gif
41 ms
button_telladmin.gif
52 ms
button_statistics.gif
59 ms
button_adv.gif
60 ms
button_rules.gif
60 ms
button_main.gif
70 ms
trup.js
73 ms
form.js
76 ms
xp_progress.js
76 ms
adv.gif
93 ms
tr-up_24.gif
75 ms
tr-up_23.gif
76 ms
tr-up_21.gif
76 ms
tr-up_28.gif
78 ms
tr-up_26.gif
77 ms
tr-up_33.gif
78 ms
tr-up_31.gif
78 ms
tr-up_30.gif
84 ms
tr-up_08.gif
87 ms
tr-up_10.gif
90 ms
tr-up_15.gif
92 ms
tr-up_13.gif
23 ms
snafer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
snafer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
snafer.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snafer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Snafer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
snafer.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snafer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: