Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

snaggedline.com

Forums - Snaggedline Kayak Fishing

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

667 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

317 ms

snaggedline.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Snaggedline content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about snaggedline.com

vBulletin Forums

Visit snaggedline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Snaggedline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 667 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

snaggedline.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,780 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

snaggedline.com

667 ms

yuiloader-dom-event.js

30 ms

vbulletin-core.js

569 ms

css.php

675 ms

vbulletin_read_marker.js

679 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Snaggedline.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Snaggedline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 534.6 kB (54%)

Content Size

989.6 kB

After Optimization

455.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Snaggedline.com main page is 989.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 677.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 57.6 kB

  • Original 69.8 kB
  • After minification 64.2 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 143.6 kB
  • After minification 141.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snaggedline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 389.8 kB

  • Original 677.0 kB
  • After minification 675.1 kB
  • After compression 287.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 389.8 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 85.4 kB

  • Original 99.3 kB
  • After minification 77.2 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snaggedline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (66%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snaggedline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

snaggedline.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

snaggedline.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

snaggedline.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snaggedline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snaggedline.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snaggedline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: