32.8 sec in total
347 ms
25 sec
7.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Snapfish content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about snapfish.in
Visit snapfish.inWe analyzed Snapfish.in page load time and found that the first response time was 347 ms and then it took 32.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
snapfish.in performance score
347 ms
1215 ms
1724 ms
614 ms
993 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Snapfish.in, 10% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 576.4 kB (54%)
1.1 MB
484.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Snapfish.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 447.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 118.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 38.3 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snapfish images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 185.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.9 kB or 42% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 271.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snapfish.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 271.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (72%)
75
21
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snapfish. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
snapfish
347 ms
snapfish
1215 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1724 ms
system.base.css
614 ms
system.menus.css
993 ms
system.messages.css
992 ms
system.theme.css
1203 ms
simplenews.css
1367 ms
date.css
1493 ms
datepicker.1.7.css
1492 ms
field.css
1494 ms
invite_by_email.css
1494 ms
node.css
1546 ms
search.css
1545 ms
uc_order.css
1546 ms
uc_product.css
1546 ms
uc_store.css
1687 ms
user.css
1687 ms
views.css
1904 ms
uc_discounts.css
1903 ms
amazon_s3.css
1737 ms
ctools.css
1737 ms
mediaclip.css
1976 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
1738 ms
onlineproducts.css
2113 ms
bootstrap.css
2376 ms
style.css
2113 ms
colors.css
1974 ms
local.css
1790 ms
media-queries.css
2180 ms
mobmenu.css
1966 ms
localv1.css
2035 ms
mjr4aiu.js
3287 ms
mobmenu.css
1943 ms
jquery.js
1996 ms
jquery.once.js
1782 ms
drupal.js
1913 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1994 ms
jquery.form.js
3002 ms
form.js
2975 ms
ajax.js
2972 ms
mediaclip.js
2593 ms
progress.js
2592 ms
jquery-1.11.js
2380 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
2081 ms
bootstrap.min.js
2080 ms
photojaanic.js
2080 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
2079 ms
oct.js
1779 ms
css
1481 ms
fbevents.js
3472 ms
logotm.png
456 ms
photobook_hardcovercoverbook.jpg
2395 ms
Prints_Squareprints.jpg
2184 ms
wall_art_Mounted_Photo_Prints.jpg
2184 ms
Calendars_desk_calendars.jpg
2167 ms
stationary_desk_passport_notebook.jpg
2167 ms
gifts_mugs.jpg
2184 ms
logo.png
3219 ms
usps.png
3219 ms
shop-kids.jpg
3126 ms
shop-wedding.jpg
3126 ms
shop-travel.jpg
3125 ms
kodak_logo.jpg
3218 ms
payment_options.jpg
3219 ms
i
1021 ms
i
3704 ms
i
3703 ms
i
3809 ms
i
3810 ms
i
3809 ms
i
3786 ms
i
3787 ms
189956368041786
235 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1733 ms
646 ms
658 ms
analytics.js
957 ms
collect
282 ms
collect
2556 ms
bat.js
2555 ms
adsct
3654 ms
visitor.css
2512 ms
visitor.js
3653 ms
adsct
4855 ms
ga-audiences
4977 ms
json
1744 ms
teamstatus
933 ms
37 ms
snapfish.in SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snapfish.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Snapfish.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
snapfish.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snapfish. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: