Tools & Wizards About Us
snapon.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

snapon.com

Snap-on Incorporated

Page Load Speed

16.4 sec in total

First Response

135 ms

Resources Loaded

16.1 sec

Page Rendered

182 ms

snapon.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to snapon.com homepage info - get ready to check Snap On best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about snapon.com

Providing a broad array of unique productivity solutions, Snap-on makes work easier for professionals performing critical tasks around the world.

Visit snapon.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Snapon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 16.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

snapon.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,940 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.624

10/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

snapon.com

135 ms

www.snapon.com

8033 ms

gtm.js

76 ms

jquery.min.js

42 ms

titanscripts.required.js

6101 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Snapon.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8 sec) belongs to the original domain Snapon.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

665.1 kB

After Optimization

577.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Snapon.com main page is 665.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 451.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 80.5 kB

  • Original 96.6 kB
  • After minification 93.1 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 117.0 kB
  • After minification 113.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snap On images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 451.4 kB
  • After minification 451.4 kB
  • After compression 447.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (78%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snap On. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

snapon.com

snapon.com

135 ms

www.snapon.com

www.snapon.com

8033 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

76 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

42 ms

titanscripts.required.js

titanscripts.required.js

6101 ms

portal.css

portal.css

6074 ms

portal_styles.css

portal_styles.css

6080 ms

titanscripts.js

titanscripts.js

6045 ms

modulemanager.js

modulemanager.js

6851 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

6025 ms

nws_animation.js

nws_animation.js

6063 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

6096 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

54 ms

Portal_site.js

Portal_site.js

6126 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

55 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

6075 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

6078 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

6080 ms

js

js

6153 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

6088 ms

js

js

42 ms

web-vitals.iife.js

web-vitals.iife.js

28 ms

web-vitals.iife.js

web-vitals.iife.js

119 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

24 ms

_bundle.js

_bundle.js

51 ms

afaf7371-f630-4d23-be30-e0e70804c716.json

afaf7371-f630-4d23-be30-e0e70804c716.json

42 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

239 ms

MakersandFixers.gif

MakersandFixers.gif

282 ms

location

location

195 ms

snap-on_icon_search_mobile_v1_white.png

snap-on_icon_search_mobile_v1_white.png

52 ms

snap-on_icon_arrows_large_32_v1.svg

snap-on_icon_arrows_large_32_v1.svg

53 ms

snap-on_icon_nav-arrow_mobile_22.svg

snap-on_icon_nav-arrow_mobile_22.svg

54 ms

snap-on_icon_back-arrow_mobile_22.svg

snap-on_icon_back-arrow_mobile_22.svg

51 ms

snap-on_icon_search_mobile_v1.svg

snap-on_icon_search_mobile_v1.svg

54 ms

css

css

156 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

16 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

152 ms

slick.css

slick.css

150 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

152 ms

NWS.Display.LazyImages.css

NWS.Display.LazyImages.css

150 ms

widget.js

widget.js

204 ms

b7dcb861-4dfa-4b8c-b576-c9eea5f48c96.woff

b7dcb861-4dfa-4b8c-b576-c9eea5f48c96.woff

232 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

140 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

14 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

49 ms

heroimage1.jpg

heroimage1.jpg

246 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

25 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

48 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

48 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

69 ms

widget_app_base_1714479274721.js

widget_app_base_1714479274721.js

27 ms

rcc2FKYoln

rcc2FKYoln

587 ms

api.js

api.js

321 ms

_bundle.css

_bundle.css

122 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

105 ms

powergeneration.jpg

powergeneration.jpg

243 ms

sturtevantrichmont.png

sturtevantrichmont.png

244 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

65 ms

Accessibility Review

snapon.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

snapon.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

snapon.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snapon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Snapon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

snapon.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snap On. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: